1941
DOI: 10.1021/j150413a019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption at Water–Air and Water–Organic Liquid Interfaces.

Abstract: The efficacy of a surface-active material in lowering the boundary tension at an interface is indicative of the extent of adsorption of the material at that boundary. The dependence of the extent of adsorption of any material upon its ability to lower the boundary tension at constant temperature is stated quantitatively by the well-known equation of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in area per molecule occurs because an excess of alcohol molecules at the interface facilitates alcohol partitioning into the monolayer. Previous studies have shown a surface excess of alcohols at interfacial alkane monolayers by experiment 30 and computer simulation. 31 Extension of this work to water/lipid interfaces has shown similar excesses, albeit not as large.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The increase in area per molecule occurs because an excess of alcohol molecules at the interface facilitates alcohol partitioning into the monolayer. Previous studies have shown a surface excess of alcohols at interfacial alkane monolayers by experiment 30 and computer simulation. 31 Extension of this work to water/lipid interfaces has shown similar excesses, albeit not as large.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…10 A show the g-values versus alcohol concentration we obtained from applying the Rawicz's model (g ¼ K A /6) to our average K A data for SOPC membranes. For comparison, g-values of alkane-water/alcohol interfaces from the data of Bartell and Davis (1941) and Rivera et al (2003) are plotted alongside. In comparison to the alkane g-values, the bilayer g-values decrease much less as alcohol concentration is increased.…”
Section: Bilayer Interfacial Tension Area Per Headgroup and Membranmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11, we can FIGURE 10 (A) Interfacial tension, g, values versus alcohol concentration for the four alcohol/water mixtures: methanol (diamonds), ethanol (squares), propanol (triangles), and butanol (circles). Values at the SOPC bilayer-water interface (solid marks) are from the K A /6 relation, and values at the alkane-water interface (open marks) are reprinted with permission from Bartell and Davis (1941) (Copyright 1941 American Chemical Society) and Rivera et al (2003) overlay our g-data onto a fit of P versus area per molecule data for an SOPC monolayer at the air-water interface from the works of Smaby et al (1994) and obtain estimates for the area-per-molecule values. For all four types of alcohol molecules, we have plotted the g-values onto the SOPCwater monolayer isotherm to obtain area-per-molecule estimates instead of using an SOPC-alcohol-water monolayer isotherm.…”
Section: Bilayer Interfacial Tension Area Per Headgroup and Membranmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the semistalk with a hydrophobic patch of ϳ3 nm diameter (corresponding to that of the narrowest part of the stalk), F O/W can be ϳ80kT, i.e., it can be comparable to the elastic energy of a stalk (Chernomordik et al, 1995b). At the hemifusion-promoting concentration of 0.5 M, ethanol decreases the water/n-heptane interface tension from 50 to 40 dyne/cm (Bartell and Davis, 1941). For a 3-nm hydrophobic patch, the alcohol-induced decrease in interfacial tension lowers F O/W from ϳ80kT to 64kT and thus might notably facilitate breaking of the lipid monolayer required for semistalk formation.…”
Section: Alcohol Can Facilitate a Local Breaking Of Lipid Monolayer Continuity Required For Stalk Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%