2019
DOI: 10.1002/app.48019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption characteristics of monodisperse magnetic cation‐exchange microspheres prepared based on swell‐penetration method

Abstract: A simple swell‐penetration method for the controlled preparation of magnetic polymer microspheres (MPMs) was developed. The polymer microspheres (PMs) were prepared using glycidyl methacrylate as monomer and trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate as crosslinker. The PMs was functionalized by coupling sulfonate groups, and then formation of the MPMs in the presence of ferrous sulfate by swell‐penetration method. The morphology, size, and magnetic properties of the MPMs were characterized by SEM, using a vibrating s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The composite microparticles were prepared by a penetration-deposition method. 32 First, 1 g of the obtained particles (i.e., PS, PG, or PGS) was sulfonated with concentrated sulfuric acid (98%, 10 mL) at 40 °C for 4 h. Then, 1 g of the sulfonated particles (i.e., SPS, SPG, or SPGS) and 0.8 g of FeSO 4 •7H 2 O were well dispersed in 50 mL of distilled water. The solution was purged with nitrogen for 30 min and then stirred at 25 °C for 12 h. Subsequently, 50 mg of NaNO 2 and 12 mL of 25% (w/w) ammonia were successively added into the flask and the mixture was kept shaking at 40 °C for another 2 h.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The composite microparticles were prepared by a penetration-deposition method. 32 First, 1 g of the obtained particles (i.e., PS, PG, or PGS) was sulfonated with concentrated sulfuric acid (98%, 10 mL) at 40 °C for 4 h. Then, 1 g of the sulfonated particles (i.e., SPS, SPG, or SPGS) and 0.8 g of FeSO 4 •7H 2 O were well dispersed in 50 mL of distilled water. The solution was purged with nitrogen for 30 min and then stirred at 25 °C for 12 h. Subsequently, 50 mg of NaNO 2 and 12 mL of 25% (w/w) ammonia were successively added into the flask and the mixture was kept shaking at 40 °C for another 2 h.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composite microparticles were prepared by a penetration-deposition method . First, 1 g of the obtained particles ( i.e ., PS, PG, or PGS) was sulfonated with concentrated sulfuric acid (98%, 10 mL) at 40 °C for 4 h. Then, 1 g of the sulfonated particles ( i.e ., SPS, SPG, or SPGS) and 0.8 g of FeSO 4 ·7H 2 O were well dispersed in 50 mL of distilled water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was widely used and has developed into products like Dynabeads ® [22]. However, up to now, most of the studies of in situ coprecipitation magnetic polymer microspheres were based on micron-sized polymer spheres [23][24][25][26], and there are few studies focused on submicron and monodispersed polymer spheres, also the bonding mechanism of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles and polymer microspheres has not been well explained. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct thorough investigations on materials with elevated Fe 3 O 4 concentrations and submicron-sized magnetic polymer microspheres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d) indicates that after SiO 2 coating and carboxyl functionalized, the Si-O and Si-O-Si vibration peaks can be observed in turn at 465 and 1078 cm − 1 , and the carboxyl characteristic peak at 1399 cm − 1 is strengthened while stretching vibration peak of C = O bond at 1730 cm − 1 is weakened. However, epoxy groups have obvious vibration peaks at 845 and 910 cm − 1[25] (Fig.S1), proving the ring-open reaction between epoxy and amino groups is complete.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This method was widely used and has developed into products like Dynabeads ® [22]. However, up to now, most of the studies of in situ coprecipitation magnetic polymer microspheres were based on micron-sized polymer spheres [23][24][25][26], and there are few studies focused on submicron and monodispersed polymer spheres, also the bonding mechanism of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles and polymer microspheres has not been well explained. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct thorough investigations on materials with elevated Fe 3 O 4 concentrations and submicron-sized magnetic polymer microspheres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%