2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(01)00834-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption–desorption noise in micromechanical resonant structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Their fabrication consisted of three steps [26]: printing the pseudo-reference (2b) and counter (3b) electrodes (graphite ink), printing the SPE layer, and printing the carbon working electrode. The area of fully printed sensor presented in this paper is 10 × 12 mm 2 .…”
Section: Fabrication Processes Of Our Amperometric No2 Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their fabrication consisted of three steps [26]: printing the pseudo-reference (2b) and counter (3b) electrodes (graphite ink), printing the SPE layer, and printing the carbon working electrode. The area of fully printed sensor presented in this paper is 10 × 12 mm 2 .…”
Section: Fabrication Processes Of Our Amperometric No2 Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increased level of noise or unusual shape of the noise spectra usually indicate failure mechanisms in particular devices [14][15][16][17][18]. Several authors showed that fluctuation analysis enables to extract a more selective response from the chemical sensors, [19][20][21][22][23][24], surface acoustic wave sensors, and resonant sensors [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Äëÿ íàíîñåíñîðà âèïàäêîâ³ñòü ïðîöåñó àäñîðáö³¿-äåñîðáö³¿ ïðèâîäèòü äî ïîì³òíèõ ôëóêòóàö³é ê³ëüêîñò³ àäñîðáîâàíîãî àíàë³òó â ñòàí³ ð³âíî-âàãè. Ö³ ôëóêòóàö³¿ ïðîÿâëÿþòüñÿ â âèõ³äíîìó ñèãíàë³ ñåíñîðà ³ â³äîì³ ÿê øóì àäñîðáö³¿-äå-ñîðáö³¿ [1]. Øóì àäñîðáö³¿-äåñîðáö³¿ ñïîñòåð³-ãàâñÿ åêñïåðèìåíòàëüíî [2,3].…”
Section: âñòóïunclassified
“…Ðîçãëÿäàºòüñÿ ñåíñîð íà îñíîâ³ åëåêòðîïðî-â³äíîãî ïîë³ìåðó ïîë³àí³ë³íó, äîïîâàíîãî îð-ãàí³÷íèìè êèñëîòàìè 1 . Ñåíñîðíèé ìàñèâ áóëî âèãîòîâëåíî ôîòîë³òîãðàô³÷íèì ìåòîäîì íà çîëîò³ íà ñòàíäàðòí³é ñêëÿíî-êåðàì³÷í³é ï³ä-êëàäö³.…”
Section: êîíñòðóêö³ÿ ñåíñîðàunclassified
“…Fluctuations caused by monolayer AD processes in adsorption-based sensors using models assuming that the number of the analyte particles around the sensor is sufficiently high to consider the analyte pressure (or concentration) constant throughout the experiment have been analyzed in Djurić et al (2002Djurić et al ( , 2007 and Jakšić et al (2009). We will denote such models as the linear ones, because of the linear dependence of the instantaneous adsorption rate on the number of adsorbed particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%