2010
DOI: 10.1021/jf9039364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption Equilibria of Water Vapor on Cork

Abstract: We report here for the first time a complete thermodynamic study of water vapor adsorption on crude cork powder and plate. Adsorption-desorption isotherms were accurately measured by thermogravimetry at 283, 298, and 313 K in a large range of relative pressure. Adsorption enthalpies were determined by calorimetry as a function of loading. Adsorption-desorption isotherms exhibit a hysteresis due to the swelling of the material. The influence of the presence of lenticels on the adsorption properties of cork is f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
55
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
55
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sorption isotherms of water ( Figure 1) and sulfur dioxide ( Figure 2) were determined and given in mmol per gram of dry cork activated under vacuum. Values are similar to those measured previously by thermogravimetry, which is a more accurate technique for studying sorption of gases on solids (Lequin et al 2009(Lequin et al , 2010. In both cases, the isotherms show a shape similar to the type II of the IUPAC classification (Sing et al 1985).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Sorption isotherms of water ( Figure 1) and sulfur dioxide ( Figure 2) were determined and given in mmol per gram of dry cork activated under vacuum. Values are similar to those measured previously by thermogravimetry, which is a more accurate technique for studying sorption of gases on solids (Lequin et al 2009(Lequin et al , 2010. In both cases, the isotherms show a shape similar to the type II of the IUPAC classification (Sing et al 1985).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…That was not the case with SO 2 (Figure 2), in that the second sorption was lower than the first sorption. Moreover, SO 2 was not completely removed by pumping under dynamic vacuum after the first sorption, indicating that SO 2 was chemisorbed on the surface, as was previously determined by thermogravimetry (Lequin et al 2009). The difference between first and second sorption allowed for calculating the chemisorbed quantity, which was ~0.024 mol.g -1 .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations