2019
DOI: 10.35208/ert.650398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of Acid Blue 25 on peach seed powder: Isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies

Abstract: In the present study peach seed powder (PSP) was used as an adsorbent to remove Acid Blue 25 (AB25) a common basic dye, from aqueous solution. The adsorption experiments were carried out in a batch system and the effects of initial concentration, interaction time and temperature were investigated. The Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin adsorption isotherms were used to model the equilibrium data. The kinetic parameters were determined by the pseudo first order (PFO), pseudo second order (PSO) and intra-particle d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As listed in Table 4, the Q m values of AB25 on BP and DP were much lower compared to those on modified activated carbon derived from egg shell (109.8 mg g −1 ) (Tovar-Gómez et al, 2012), lychee peel (200.0 mg g −1 ) (Bhatnagar & Minocha, 2010), tea waste activated carbon (203.3 mg g −1 ) (Auta & Hameed, 2011), Penaeus indicus shell (415.3 mg g −1 ) (Kousha et al, 2015), and pectin (719.4 mg g −1 ) (Shahrin et al, 2021). However, they were comparable or slightly higher with those on several agricultural wastes such as peach seed (95.2 mg g −1 ) (Kul et al, 2019), modified banana peel (89.5 mg g −1 ) (Guiso et al, 2014), hazelnut shells (60.2 mg g −1 ) (Ferrero, 2007), and Ficus rasemosa leaf powder (83.3 mg g −1 ) ( Jain & Gogate, 2017), and were much higher than adsorbents derived from other agricultural wastes as such as Azolla pinnata (50.5 mg g −1 ) (Kooh et al, 2016), soybean waste (38.3 mg g −1 ) (Kooh et al, 2016), walnut sawdust (37.0 mg g −1 ) (Ferrero, 2007), rubber leaf powder (28.1 mg g −1 ) (Khalid et al, 2015), Shorea dasyphylla sawdust (24.4 mg g −1 ) (Hanafiah et al, 2012), cempedak durian peel (26.6 mg g −1 ) (Dahri et al, 2016), pine sawdust (26.2) (Ferrero, 2007), oak sawdust (27.9 mg g −1 ) (Ferrero, 2007), and rambutan seed (25.6 mg g −1 ) (Lakkaboyana et al, 2018). These findings indicate that BP and DP were among the best of the potential agricultural wastes to remove negatively charged dyes from an aqueous solution.…”
Section: Comparison Of Q M Values For Adsorption Of Ab25 On Different Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As listed in Table 4, the Q m values of AB25 on BP and DP were much lower compared to those on modified activated carbon derived from egg shell (109.8 mg g −1 ) (Tovar-Gómez et al, 2012), lychee peel (200.0 mg g −1 ) (Bhatnagar & Minocha, 2010), tea waste activated carbon (203.3 mg g −1 ) (Auta & Hameed, 2011), Penaeus indicus shell (415.3 mg g −1 ) (Kousha et al, 2015), and pectin (719.4 mg g −1 ) (Shahrin et al, 2021). However, they were comparable or slightly higher with those on several agricultural wastes such as peach seed (95.2 mg g −1 ) (Kul et al, 2019), modified banana peel (89.5 mg g −1 ) (Guiso et al, 2014), hazelnut shells (60.2 mg g −1 ) (Ferrero, 2007), and Ficus rasemosa leaf powder (83.3 mg g −1 ) ( Jain & Gogate, 2017), and were much higher than adsorbents derived from other agricultural wastes as such as Azolla pinnata (50.5 mg g −1 ) (Kooh et al, 2016), soybean waste (38.3 mg g −1 ) (Kooh et al, 2016), walnut sawdust (37.0 mg g −1 ) (Ferrero, 2007), rubber leaf powder (28.1 mg g −1 ) (Khalid et al, 2015), Shorea dasyphylla sawdust (24.4 mg g −1 ) (Hanafiah et al, 2012), cempedak durian peel (26.6 mg g −1 ) (Dahri et al, 2016), pine sawdust (26.2) (Ferrero, 2007), oak sawdust (27.9 mg g −1 ) (Ferrero, 2007), and rambutan seed (25.6 mg g −1 ) (Lakkaboyana et al, 2018). These findings indicate that BP and DP were among the best of the potential agricultural wastes to remove negatively charged dyes from an aqueous solution.…”
Section: Comparison Of Q M Values For Adsorption Of Ab25 On Different Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Therefore, at ambient pH, agricultural wastes with carboxylic acid groups, would have a negative net surface charge which could suppress their electrostatic attraction to the negatively charged dyes. This assumption is supported by the low adsorption capacity of AB25, for instance, on cempedak durian peel (Dahri 2 Air, Soil and Water Research et al, 2016), pine sawdust (Ferrero, 2007), peach seed (Kul et al, 2019), powdered Ficus rasemosa leaves ( Jain & Gogate, 2017), Azolla pinnata (Kooh et al, 2016), soybean waste (Kooh et al, 2016), and rambutan seed (Lakkaboyana et al, 2018). This explanation could also apply to other negatively charged dyes such as Acid Green 25 (AG25) on durian peel (DP) (Hameed & Hakimi, 2008), Acid Violet 54 (AV54) on banana peel (BP) (Kumar et al, 2010), Congo red (CR) on BP (Mondal & Kar, 2018), and Acid violet 17 (AV17) on orange peel (Chiou & Chuang, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…R 2 values of three isotherm models are high, but R 2 values of the Freundlich model are higher than other model values for two types of bentonite. Previously reported results from various researchers were available for AB25 adsorption on different adsorbents and biosorbents such as; rubber leaf powder, activated carbon, diatomite, sepiolite, lychee peel, cempedak peel, soya bean waste, tarap peel, water lettuce [26].…”
Section: Adsorption Isotherm Model Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, adsorptive removal of AB25 from aqueous solution has been investigated by exploring different types of adsorbents such as polymer-clay nanocomposites [ 20 ], pectin [ 21 ], activated carbons [ 22 , 23 ], and agricultural wastes. These include banana peel and durian peel [ 11 ], sawdust [ 15 ], Shorea dasyphylla sawdust [ 24 ], oak sawdust [ 15 ], cempedak durian peel [ 25 ], rambutan seed [ 26 ], hazelnut shells [ 15 ], shrimp shells [ 27 ], peach seed [ 28 ], plant leaves [ 29 , 30 ], and soybean waste [ 31 ]. Many of the adsorbents have been demonstrated to successfully remove AB25 from water systems with high efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%