2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2015.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of biosolids and their main components on chalcopyrite, molybdenite and pyrite: Zeta potential and FTIR spectroscopy studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, Figure 9 exhibits the apparent zeta potential of pyrite particles as a function of pH in the absence and presence of 4 g/L AAPP. The zeta potential curve shows that the isoelectric point (IEP) of pyrite was around 3.0, which is close to the reported value [64]. It is clear that the presence of AAPP elevated the negativity of the surface charges of pyrite particles, demonstrating the adsorption of electronegative radical ions of AAPP on pyrite surfaces.…”
Section: Role Of Aapp Additivesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Actually, Figure 9 exhibits the apparent zeta potential of pyrite particles as a function of pH in the absence and presence of 4 g/L AAPP. The zeta potential curve shows that the isoelectric point (IEP) of pyrite was around 3.0, which is close to the reported value [64]. It is clear that the presence of AAPP elevated the negativity of the surface charges of pyrite particles, demonstrating the adsorption of electronegative radical ions of AAPP on pyrite surfaces.…”
Section: Role Of Aapp Additivesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, it has been postulated that chemical interactions between the hydroxyl groups of polysaccharide (e.g., guar gum) with the metal hydroxyl groups at the mineral surface (e.g., chalcopyrite) may also occur in addition to hydrogen bonding [58,59]. A similar observation has been made for the interaction of biosolids with chalcopyrite, molybdenite and pyrite, although a weaker interaction such as hydrogen bonding or van der Waals force was proposed for the interaction of humic acid with these sulphide minerals [27,60]. The higher adsorption of HA than TA on the minerals surface may also be attributed to the presence of carboxyl groups on HA which are absent on TA and may chemically interact with mineral sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…These results indicated that the formation of PbSO 4 led to the low bioleaching of Pb, and the presence of jarosite actually affected the kinetics or dissolution of multi-metals (for example, a high concentration of Fe 2+ ). 39 The results of the FTIR spectrum in Fig. 7b again indicated the appearance of the band of SO 4 2À related to PbSO 4 near 1087 cm À1 in the bioleached residues.…”
Section: Brine Leaching Pb From Bioleached Residuesmentioning
confidence: 71%