2023
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.202300022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of Carbamazepine in All‐Silica Zeolites Studied with Density Functional Theory Calculations**

Abstract: The anticonvulsant drug carbamazepine (À ) is an emerging contaminant of considerable concern due to its hazard potential and environmental persistence. Previous experimental studies proposed hydrophobic zeolites as promising adsorbents for the removal of carbamazepine from water, but only a few framework types were considered in those investigations. In the present work, electronic structure calculations based on dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT) were used to study the adsorption of CBZ in … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
2
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculations of the adsorption energies for TCS in all-silica zeolites delivered very similar adsorption energies in the range of −153 to −160 kJ mol -1 for five of the six frameworks, with a weaker interaction being observed only for FAU, which possesses large supercages. This is a notably different finding compared to the previous DFT study of CBZ adsorption, where adsorption energies obtained for these five zeolites varied between −122 kJ mol -1 for BEA and −172 kJ mol -1 for IFR (Fischer 2023). This qualitative difference can be attributed to the higher flexibility of TCS, which allows it to adjust in a way that the interaction with the pore walls in differently shaped pores is maximized.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Calculations of the adsorption energies for TCS in all-silica zeolites delivered very similar adsorption energies in the range of −153 to −160 kJ mol -1 for five of the six frameworks, with a weaker interaction being observed only for FAU, which possesses large supercages. This is a notably different finding compared to the previous DFT study of CBZ adsorption, where adsorption energies obtained for these five zeolites varied between −122 kJ mol -1 for BEA and −172 kJ mol -1 for IFR (Fischer 2023). This qualitative difference can be attributed to the higher flexibility of TCS, which allows it to adjust in a way that the interaction with the pore walls in differently shaped pores is maximized.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…The largest deviation of about 20% occurs for all-silica FAU, followed by H-FAU (16%), whereas the differences for all-silica MOR (10%) and H-MOR (7%) are significantly smaller. As observed in the previous study of CBZ adsorption, where FAU, IFR, and MOR were compared (Fischer 2023), the deviation between "dynamic" and "static" results is directly correlated with the guest molecule's freedom of motion in the zeolite pores: Much more pronounced oscillations are possible in the large cages of FAU than in the comparatively narrow channels of MOR. This results in a larger impact of thermal motion on the internal energy of adsorption in the former system.…”
Section: Aimd Simulationssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations