2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcice.2008.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of chromium (III) ion from aqueous solution using rice hull ash

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum adsorption at pH 3 may be attributed to the existence of chromium ions as HCrO 4 -which is the dominant form of Cr(VI) at pH 3. The high adsorption of Cr(VI) at pH 3 might be a result of electrostatic attraction between positively charged groups of the ACRF surface and HCrO 4 -.…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum adsorption at pH 3 may be attributed to the existence of chromium ions as HCrO 4 -which is the dominant form of Cr(VI) at pH 3. The high adsorption of Cr(VI) at pH 3 might be a result of electrostatic attraction between positively charged groups of the ACRF surface and HCrO 4 -.…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Persistent exposure to Cr(VI) causes cancer in the digestive tract and lungs, and may cause other health problems, for instance skin dermatitis, bronchitis, perforation of the nasal septum, severe diarrhoea, and haemorrhaging [2,3]. The maximum level for chromium in drinking water permitted by the World Health Organization (WHO) is 0.05 mg/L [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that non-living plant biomass materials are effective for the removal of trace metals from the environment (Elaigwu et al, 2009;Wang and Lin, 2008). Whereas many previous studies have reported the adsorption of metals by materials of diverse biological origin, these have remained limited to the removal of single metal ion and little information is available for multimetal adsorption systems (Abdel-Ghani et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also apparent from the figure is the increase in % removal of each metal ion as a result of increase in adsorbent dose for both adsorbents under investigation; a trend similarly reported by various workers such as Bansal et al (2009) and Opeolu et al (2009). This observed phenomenon is readily understood from the fact that the number of available adsorption sites increases by increasing the adsorbent dose and it, therefore, results in the increase of removal efficiency of the respective ions (Bhattacharya et al, (2008); Wang & Lin (2008)). The adsorption order of the ions on GZM varies according to Fe > Cr > Cd > Ni, while on GCO the order is Fe > Cr > Ni > Cd, which according to Sun and Shin (1998) could be explained based on the modes of adsorption onto cellulosic materials as represented by intrinsic and coulombic interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%