Selective separation of heavy metal ions from acidic aqueous solutions is of strong interest for certain industrial processes, such as electroplating, as well as environmental protection, for example battery recycling. Amino‐functionalized adsorbents are often discussed as suitable material for this purpose. Herein, two silica‐based adsorbents functionalized with 3‐aminopropyl‐ and 3‐[2‐[2‐aminoethylamino]‐ethylamino]‐propyl‐ligands resulting in adsorbents MonoA and TriA, respectively, were investigated regarding their separation behavior with focus on nickel(II) and cobalt(II) in batch as well as continuous flow experiments in acidic aqueous solutions. For both adsorbents, pH shifts into the alkaline range were observed in the process solutions, causing precipitation of metal hydroxides mainly in the particle pores in case of adsorbent MonoA and a combination of precipitation and adsorption regarding adsorbent TriA.
Contrary to prior studies, our findings evidence that amino‐functionalized adsorbents are not applicable for nickel(II) and cobalt(II) in selective adsorption processes and additionally demonstrate that, besides batch investigations, continuous flow experiments are essential for well‐founded adsorbent selections in process development.