2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of diclofenac from aqueous solution using UiO-66-type metal-organic frameworks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that SCNT presented one strong diffraction peak at 26° and the other weak peak at 43°, which were, respectively, distributed to the (002) and (100) planes of SCNT. And the XRD pattern of UiO‐66 was consistent with the literature . The diffraction peaks of UiO‐66‐SCNT and UiO‐66‐SCNT@GO nanocomposites were almost identical to raw UiO‐66, indicating that the introduction of carbon nanomaterials in the in situ crystallization process had no significant effect on the crystal structure of UiO‐66.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen that SCNT presented one strong diffraction peak at 26° and the other weak peak at 43°, which were, respectively, distributed to the (002) and (100) planes of SCNT. And the XRD pattern of UiO‐66 was consistent with the literature . The diffraction peaks of UiO‐66‐SCNT and UiO‐66‐SCNT@GO nanocomposites were almost identical to raw UiO‐66, indicating that the introduction of carbon nanomaterials in the in situ crystallization process had no significant effect on the crystal structure of UiO‐66.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…And the XRD pattern of UiO-66 was consistent with the literature. 36 The diffraction peaks of UiO-66-SCNT and UiO-66-SCNT@GO nanocomposites were almost identical to raw UiO-66, indicating that the introduction of carbon nanomaterials in the in situ crystallization process had no significant effect on the crystal structure of UiO-66. To further demonstrate chemical bonding of UiO-66, UiO-66-SCNT, and UiO-66-SCNT@GO, FTIR analysis was performed ( Figure 2B).…”
Section: Characterization Of Uio-66-scnt and Uio-66-scnt@gomentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although MOFs commonly exhibit much weaker stability in comparison with conventional porous materials such as activated carbon and metal oxide [130][131][132][133], UiO family is an important branch of MOFs that has a high thermal and chemical stability in comparison with other MOFs [134]. Zirconium MOFs (Zr-MOFs) are one archetypical UiO-family that is based on 12-connected metal nodes and usually adopts face-centered cubic (fcu) network topology [135].…”
Section: Uio Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudo-second order [85] GAC (functionalized with Fe) Freundlich Pseudo-second order [83] Moringa oleifera pod biosorbent Freundlich Pseudo-second order [80] Commercial AC Freundlich Intra-particle diffusion [80] Lignite activated coke Freundlich Pseudo-second order [79] Metal organic framework (UiO-66 type) Langmuir Pseudo-second order [71] Montmorillonite clay (modified by hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium) Langmuir - [52] AC from Terminalia catappa fruit shell Freundlich Intra-particle diffusion [44] AC from cocoa shell Liu General order [48] Hexagonal mesoporous silicate (modified by (3-mercaptopropyl)-trimethoxy)…”
Section: Langmuirmentioning
confidence: 99%