2019
DOI: 10.1134/s2070205119030134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of Hydrogen in Microporous Carbon Adsorbents of Different Origin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, according to Schlapbach and Zuttel [78], the maximum hydrogen adsorption capacity on a porous solid is 1.3 × 10 -5 mol m -2 , which leads to a maximum uptake of 34 mol kg -1 (i.e., 6.8 wt.%) for a graphene sheet whose specific surface area is 2630 m 2 g -1 [63]. Using the A BET obtained from the textural characterisation of the two ACs studied, we calculated the hypothetical maximum hydrogen storage for both MSC30 and MSP20X, i.e., 42.96 mol kg -1 and 30.72 mol kg -1 , respectively, which are considerably lower than the values obtained from the fit of the data (i.e., 72.46 and 47.38 mol kg -1 , respectively). In addition, the definition of V a still remains ambiguous.…”
Section: Application Of the Modified Dubinin-astakhov (Mda) Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, according to Schlapbach and Zuttel [78], the maximum hydrogen adsorption capacity on a porous solid is 1.3 × 10 -5 mol m -2 , which leads to a maximum uptake of 34 mol kg -1 (i.e., 6.8 wt.%) for a graphene sheet whose specific surface area is 2630 m 2 g -1 [63]. Using the A BET obtained from the textural characterisation of the two ACs studied, we calculated the hypothetical maximum hydrogen storage for both MSC30 and MSP20X, i.e., 42.96 mol kg -1 and 30.72 mol kg -1 , respectively, which are considerably lower than the values obtained from the fit of the data (i.e., 72.46 and 47.38 mol kg -1 , respectively). In addition, the definition of V a still remains ambiguous.…”
Section: Application Of the Modified Dubinin-astakhov (Mda) Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat of adsorption is generally evaluated by using the sorption isosteric method [39], which consists in applying the Clausius-Clapeyron equation to the adsorption isotherms calculated over a wide range of temperature and pressures. The latter method reliably determines the isosteric heat of adsorption [40], which ranges from 3 to 7.5 kJ mol -1 [41] for hydrogen adsorption on the Metal Organic Framework (MOF) MIL-101 and on different microporous carbon adsorbents [42]. The smallest pores contribute the most to the average heat of adsorption and are the first to be filled [43], and the heat of adsorption decreases with the surface coverage [44,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a number of works [12,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] shows that the DRA equation can be used to quantitatively describe experimental isotherms also at temperatures above critical by more than 100-150 K on active microporous carbons, zeolites, silica gels, and molecular sieves. In particular, the DRA equation can be used to describe the adsorption of CH4, N2, H2 on Zeo-5A@MOF-74-1 zeolite at temperature T = 298 K and pressure P = 0-22 atm [12]; H2 on active carbons [23,24]; Ar on zeolite 13X [32]; CH4 on zeolites 13X, CaLSX, KLSX, LiLSX at T = 298-343 К and P = 0-1 atm [31]; CH4, N2 on zeolites Cu-BTC and MaxSorb at T = 298-303 К and P = 0-40 atm [30]; CO on zeolite 13X at T = 293-343 К and P = 0-1 atm [27]. Works [22,25] propose to replace the saturation pressure with standard pressures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%