2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of Malachite Green dye onto activated carbon derived from Borassus aethiopum flower biomass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
73
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the fact that BET surface area was found to be 0.683 and 0.114 m 2 g À1 for CAd and SAd, respectively, it highlights the need for carbonization after chemical treatment for precursors. Some works have reported the similar result for low-cost adsorbents prepared from Delonix regia pods and Borassus aethiopum flower biomass (Ho et al, 2009;Nethaji et al, 2010). The use of adsorbents with BET surface area much lesser than 100 m 2 g À1 in the removal of pollutants has also been reported (Daifullah and Girgis, 1998;Danish et al, 2011;Jassim et al, 2012;Karago¨z et al, 2008;Munusamy et al, 2011;Murthy et al, 2013;Norlia et al, 2011;Singh et al, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Despite the fact that BET surface area was found to be 0.683 and 0.114 m 2 g À1 for CAd and SAd, respectively, it highlights the need for carbonization after chemical treatment for precursors. Some works have reported the similar result for low-cost adsorbents prepared from Delonix regia pods and Borassus aethiopum flower biomass (Ho et al, 2009;Nethaji et al, 2010). The use of adsorbents with BET surface area much lesser than 100 m 2 g À1 in the removal of pollutants has also been reported (Daifullah and Girgis, 1998;Danish et al, 2011;Jassim et al, 2012;Karago¨z et al, 2008;Munusamy et al, 2011;Murthy et al, 2013;Norlia et al, 2011;Singh et al, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…As can be seen, the adsorption uptakes of RBBR increased from 4.2 to 14.1 mg/g and from 11.5 to 30.4 mg/g for R-CL and Zn-CL, respectively for an increase in Zn-CL dose from 0.2 to 0.5 g. This was due to contribution of the increasing sorbent surface area and availability of more adsorption sites. However, the adsorption uptakes decreased after 0.5 g. This may be due to the decrease in total adsorption surface area available to RBBR resulting from overlapping or aggregation of adsorption sites [14]. …”
Section: Effect Of the Adsorbent Dosagementioning
confidence: 95%
“…In order to investigate mechanism of adsorption and to determine rate-controlling step the following kinetic rate equations have been used to test the experimental data (Zhao et al, 2008;Nethaji et al, 2010).…”
Section: Adsorption Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%