2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of mercury ions from synthetic aqueous solution using polydopamine decorated SWCNTs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated parameters of Thomas and Adams-Bohart model are presented in Table 7 . Comparison of the fitness of dynamic adsorption data with the models were based on the higher values of R 2 , Consequently, Table 7 shows that the experimental data were best fitted by Thomas model with R 2 above 0.964, compared to the Adams-Bohart model with the highest R 2 of 0.887, thereby corresponding to pseudo-second order rate driving force 80 . Above all, the results obtained for the continuous adsorption corresponds to results of batch adsorption based on assumption of Thomas model for pseudo-second order kinetics which remarks that adsorption process was mass transfer controlled at the interface, not by chemical reaction 49 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated parameters of Thomas and Adams-Bohart model are presented in Table 7 . Comparison of the fitness of dynamic adsorption data with the models were based on the higher values of R 2 , Consequently, Table 7 shows that the experimental data were best fitted by Thomas model with R 2 above 0.964, compared to the Adams-Bohart model with the highest R 2 of 0.887, thereby corresponding to pseudo-second order rate driving force 80 . Above all, the results obtained for the continuous adsorption corresponds to results of batch adsorption based on assumption of Thomas model for pseudo-second order kinetics which remarks that adsorption process was mass transfer controlled at the interface, not by chemical reaction 49 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, negative ∆H 0 values represent the exothermic nature of the adsorption of MB by rGO adsorbent, say, a negative enthalpy (−2.20 kJ mol −1 ) implies that temperature increase had negative impact on the adsorption of MB, resulting in higher adsorption at lower temperatures. Negative ∆H 0 values, particularly, indicate that high temperature during adsorption process causes low adsorption efficiency [79]. The positive value of ∆S 0 = 0.069 confirms the good affinity of MB toward the rGO nanosheets, and the increased randomness at the rGO-water interface during the adsorption process [52].…”
Section: Adsorption Thermodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, the adsorption process is assigned to physisorption in nature when the ΔG 0 value is in the range from 0 to −20 kJ mol −1 , while ΔG 0 values in the range from −80 to −400 kJ mol −1 suggest a chemisorption process [52]. The partition between these two categories is vague [79]. Then, based on isotherm models it was seen that in this (MB-rGO) process both monolayer adsorption (chemisorption) and multilayer adsorption (physisorption) can occur.…”
Section: Adsorption Thermodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case S2 illustrates the breakthrough behavior of mercury adsorption on a nano-adsorbent [38]. Case S3…”
Section: Additional Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%