2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-8188-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of metribuzin from aqueous solution using magnetic and nonmagnetic sustainable low-cost biochar adsorbents

Abstract: Switchgrass biochar (SGB) was made by fast pyrolysis in an auger-fed reactor at 425 °C with a solid residence time of 60 s in the pyrolysis zone during bio-oil production. Magnetic switchgrass biochar (MSGB) was prepared by iron oxide precipitation onto the biochar surface using an aqueous Fe/Fe solution followed by NaOH treatment. Both the SGB and the MSGB were characterized by FTIR, SEM, SEM-EDX, TGA, pH, elemental analysis, and surface area measurements. Batch sorption studies of metribuzin from aqueous sol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two less water-soluble BOS and OP showed the great the DIG sample, their concentration on the material being about 6 and 7 respectively, than that of MET. The lower adsorption of MET on organic su pared to other pesticides and ECDs, is generally responsible for the high mo in soil and sediments and the consequent dangerous release into natural wa Although, as expected, the extent of DIG sorption in this study was somehow lower than that of biochar for MET [26,27,36], BOS [8], BPA [37] and OP [24], it can be considered remarkable and suggests a valuable use of this material as biosorbent. To the best of our knowledge, the literature does not report information on the removal of the four molecules studied by the DIG alone.…”
Section: Preliminary Adsorption Experimentssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The two less water-soluble BOS and OP showed the great the DIG sample, their concentration on the material being about 6 and 7 respectively, than that of MET. The lower adsorption of MET on organic su pared to other pesticides and ECDs, is generally responsible for the high mo in soil and sediments and the consequent dangerous release into natural wa Although, as expected, the extent of DIG sorption in this study was somehow lower than that of biochar for MET [26,27,36], BOS [8], BPA [37] and OP [24], it can be considered remarkable and suggests a valuable use of this material as biosorbent. To the best of our knowledge, the literature does not report information on the removal of the four molecules studied by the DIG alone.…”
Section: Preliminary Adsorption Experimentssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Biochar has attracted much attention due to its excellent adsorption capacity for pollutants in aqueous solution. However, the need for centrifugation and filtration steps may limit the large-scale application of biochar in wastewater [21][22][23]. Biochar surfaces are normally negatively charged and may facilitate positive-charged adsorption, but may be inefficient in adsorption for anions such as nitrate, which are abundant in farm wastewater and priority pollutants for water quality control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These amendments' behavior is essentially due to the numerous sorption sites present on the organic components where pollutants can be linked with bonds of different types and strengths. For instance, MET sorption onto BC occurs mainly through H bonds and Coulombic forces and, to a lesser extent, through van der Waals, dipole-dipole, and π-π interactions (Essandoh et al 2017). The carbonized phase of BC can adsorb OP through chemical interactions involving covalent and H bonds (Loffredo and Taskin 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%