2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.11.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of MS2 bacteriophage on ultrafiltration membrane laboratory equipments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Langlet et al (24) have recently demonstrated that aggregation of phage MS2 results in a strong decrease of PFU counts. Under our batch experimental conditions, aggregation can be excluded, as the pH of the solution was higher than the pI (pI 3.9) of MS2 (24) and, in the stock solution, phage was not aggregated at all as defined in a previous work by transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering (Nanosizer) (30). The adsorption of viruses to the recipient surfaces can also be considered negligible because the number of total genomic MS2 particles detected by qRT-PCR remained constant throughout the batch experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Langlet et al (24) have recently demonstrated that aggregation of phage MS2 results in a strong decrease of PFU counts. Under our batch experimental conditions, aggregation can be excluded, as the pH of the solution was higher than the pI (pI 3.9) of MS2 (24) and, in the stock solution, phage was not aggregated at all as defined in a previous work by transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering (Nanosizer) (30). The adsorption of viruses to the recipient surfaces can also be considered negligible because the number of total genomic MS2 particles detected by qRT-PCR remained constant throughout the batch experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 30 s of homogenization at room temperature (time zero), MS2 feed suspension was circulated in the system (60 liters/h; Reynolds number [Re] ϭ 1,800) with recycling of the retentate and permeate in the feed tank. Fifteen minutes after the start of filtration, the suspension was "doped" by adding 2 ml of phage stock suspension at 1 ϫ 10 11 PFU/ml to the feed suspension in order to saturate the MS2 adsorption in the filtration apparatus and thus to maintain a phage concentration of 1 ϫ 10 8 PFU/ml in the system as previously described (30,39). Samples of viral suspensions were collected at different times at sampling points ( Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CV (ACS reagent, > 90.0% anhydrous basis) was obtained from Aldrich. Two types of bacteria, B. diminuta and E. coli , were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), and one virus model, bacteriophage MS2, was prepared by incubation using the procedures previously demonstrated …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two types of bacteria, B. diminuta and E. coli, were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), and one virus model, bacteriophage MS2, was prepared by incubation using the procedures previously demonstrated. 25 Preparation of Cellulose Nanowhisker-Based Nanofibrous MF Membranes. A composite nanofibrous membrane (electrospun PAN on PET nonwoven) in the form of a disk sample with 25 mm diameter was latched in a dead-end filtration cell (Millipore, model 8050), where 0.1 g of cellulose nanowhisker aqueous suspension (0.4 wt % concentration, pH 7.0) was gradually infused into the membrane disk by gravity.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plaque assay procedure was used to determine the concentration of the MS2 phage (to measure the virus titer). The plaque assay was conducted according to the method described in ( 62 ) with some modifications. E. coli was grown to mid-logarithmic phase (OD 600 of 0.3 to 0.4) in LB at 37°C with shaking.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%