2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.02.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of n-butyl-substituted tetrathiafulvalene dodecanethiol on gold

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results lead to important conclusion the observed specific chemical state representing large chemical shift is inherent to sulfur-gold interface. As to the S 2p XPS, Petoral Jr. et al reported that the energy of the S 2p peak in XPS is lower by about 2 eV than as a result of a strong molecule-surface interaction in the S 2p XPS spectra for thiol-Au bond [25]. Similar results were reported by the other groups [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…These results lead to important conclusion the observed specific chemical state representing large chemical shift is inherent to sulfur-gold interface. As to the S 2p XPS, Petoral Jr. et al reported that the energy of the S 2p peak in XPS is lower by about 2 eV than as a result of a strong molecule-surface interaction in the S 2p XPS spectra for thiol-Au bond [25]. Similar results were reported by the other groups [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Many authors have reported the electrochemical properties of TTF derivative SAMs. Such studies include the redox activity of TTF derivatives on gold, 18,25,26 electrochemical polymerization, 27 double-layer capacitance, 28 metal ion recognition, [29][30][31][32] and host-guest complexation. 33,34 However, a microscopic understanding of the electrochemical processes of TTFterminated SAMs has not yet been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 This may be because the sample was oxidized during the recrystallization process. In contrast, for the structure of L-cysteine in water, as previously discussed with respect to Figure 3, the resonance peaks of SO 4 2− (peaks D and E) are not observed although the resonance absorption peak from the S 1s orbital to the 2e − orbital is seen as peak C at the lower energy side. These results confirm that the sulfur atoms are not oxidized to SO 4 2− in water at pH 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In contrast, for the structure of L-cysteine in water, as previously discussed with respect to Figure 3, the resonance peaks of SO 4 2− (peaks D and E) are not observed although the resonance absorption peak from the S 1s orbital to the 2e − orbital is seen as peak C at the lower energy side. These results confirm that the sulfur atoms are not oxidized to SO 4 2− in water at pH 7. We expect that L-cysteine molecules in pH 7 water are surrounded by H 2 O, and the -SH group should form a hydrate with the water molecules without dissociating.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%