2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of phenolic compounds from aqueous solutions using carbon nanoporous adsorbent coated with polymer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH was adjusted to values ranging from 1 to 13 using 1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH solution. The conical flasks were agitated at 150 rpm using a mechanical shaker to reach equilibrium (Anbia and Ghaffari 2009). After filtration, the concentration of the remaining metal ions in aqueous phase was measured.…”
Section: Effect Of the Solution Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH was adjusted to values ranging from 1 to 13 using 1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH solution. The conical flasks were agitated at 150 rpm using a mechanical shaker to reach equilibrium (Anbia and Ghaffari 2009). After filtration, the concentration of the remaining metal ions in aqueous phase was measured.…”
Section: Effect Of the Solution Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surfactant-templated mesoporous materials have some specific features such as high surface areas and high adsorption capacities including the uniformity and periodicity of tunable mesopores [9][10][11], which are widely applicable to adsorbents and catalytic supports [12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these sorbent materials, activated carbons are the most widely used and exhibit good adsorption capacities for many organic pollutants due to their porous structures and large surface areas (Aksu and Yener 2001;Anbia and Ghaffari 2009;Nath and Bhakhar 2010;Zhou et al 2014). However, the application of activated carbons can be limited by a range of factors, including high cost, poor adsorption selectivity, poor mechanical strength, and expensive and difficult regeneration (Ferro-Garcia et al 1996;Anbia and Ghaffari 2009;Anbia and Lashgari 2009;Ahmad et al 2011;Shah et al 2011). In contrast, zeolites have a number of potential advantages as sorbents, such as good mechanical strength, good thermal stability, and high sorption selectivity (Wang and Peng 2010;Misaelides 2011).…”
Section: Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues Submitted To: Environmentioning
confidence: 99%