2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c01902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of Single and Multiple Graphene-Oxide Nanoparticles at a Water–Vapor Interface

Abstract: The adsorption of graphene-oxide (GO) nanoparticles at the interface between water and vapor was analyzed using all-atom molecular simulations for single and multiple particles. For a single GO particle, our results indicate that the adsorption energy does not scale linearly with the surface coverage of oxygen groups, unlike typically assumed for Janus colloids. Our results also show that the surface activity of the particle depends on the number of surface oxygen groups as well as on their distribution: for a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[38][39] Bulk techniques, namely FTIR, Raman, UV-vis, and xray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), have identified varied adsorbed metal-GO binding, ranging from likely electrostatics 23,25 to specific binding with sulfur-and oxygen-based groups, 25,32,40 although the exact binding mechanisms remain unknown. Computational efforts have supported these findings, [41][42] mainly with surface complexation models. 29,[31][32] However, a large gap between computational and experimental agreement still exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…[38][39] Bulk techniques, namely FTIR, Raman, UV-vis, and xray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), have identified varied adsorbed metal-GO binding, ranging from likely electrostatics 23,25 to specific binding with sulfur-and oxygen-based groups, 25,32,40 although the exact binding mechanisms remain unknown. Computational efforts have supported these findings, [41][42] mainly with surface complexation models. 29,[31][32] However, a large gap between computational and experimental agreement still exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In an interfacial monolayer of 2D nanosheets, the nanosheets can overlap slightly [13,41,42]. This overlap can result in a small but finite effective bending rigidity because of the attractive force between the sheets in the overlapping region.…”
Section: D Model With Bending Rigiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model suggests a strong 3 scaling with the overlap length. For graphene oxide sheets in high-humidity conditions, molecular dynamics simulations suggest r 0 7.7-12 Å [44,45] and 0.1-0.2 J/m 2 [42,46]. Taking realistic values = 0.2 J/m 2 , and r 0 = 12 Å and an average sheet length L = 1 μm, D/(γ L 2 ) is estimated to be 0.02 and 26 for = 1 nm and 10 nm, respectively (assuming the surface tension of water, γ = 0.07 J/m 2 ).…”
Section: D Model With Bending Rigiditymentioning
confidence: 99%