2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(03)00117-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of volatile organic compounds by pecan shell- and almond shell-based granular activated carbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
82
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
82
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is obvious that the prepared activated carbon is having both high micropore and mesopore volume and it can be potentially used for phenol as well as dye removal from aqueous waste. Again the B.E.T surface area of prepared activated carbon is found to be 1358 m 2 /g which shows that it is comparable and better to the findings of earlier researchers 17 .…”
Section: Characterization Of Adsorbentsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It is obvious that the prepared activated carbon is having both high micropore and mesopore volume and it can be potentially used for phenol as well as dye removal from aqueous waste. Again the B.E.T surface area of prepared activated carbon is found to be 1358 m 2 /g which shows that it is comparable and better to the findings of earlier researchers 17 .…”
Section: Characterization Of Adsorbentsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Both systems, however, initially require adequate ventilation. Adsorption on activated carbon has undoubtedly been the most popular and widely used technology in the treatment of exhaust gases throughout the world (Bansode et al, 2003;Christian and Verga, 2004;Lillo-Ro'denas et al, 2005). Due to its suitable surface for microbial attachment, GAC itself has been used as a biofilter medium in the biological treatment of odors and volatile organic compounds (VOCs); however, little is known regarding the clean-up of airborne bioaerosols from the air by adsorption on activated carbon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that secondary treatment could remove most of the toxicants in raw water and that SS-UF-RO and SS-AC perform better compare to all the other technologies tested. Based on chemical measurements, the AC process has been shown to more efficiently remove organic compounds and heavy metals from waters (Bansode et al, 2003;Dinesh and Kunwar, 2002). Similarly, recent research has shown that UF-RO also effectively removed trace toxicants (Brehant et al, 2002).…”
Section: Acute Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, membrane filtration has high virus removal efficiency and was increasingly applied in disinfection processes for raw water and municipal effluent reuse (Madaeni et al, 1995;Glucina et al, 2000;Mousa et al, 2003). Activated carbon is effective in the adsorbent removal of volatile organic compounds in sewage treatment (Bansode et al, 2003). With the wrong selection, some treatment technologies may result in the discharges of toxic chemicals and pathogenic microorganisms (Chaler et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%