2000
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.7116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of Water Vapor on a Graphitized Carbon Black

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
40
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
9
40
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually such states are not accessible in experiments because bulk condensation occurs without any metastability. A notable exception is work by Easton and Machin [15] for water in graphitized carbon black where special precautions were taken to delay water condensation in the sample cell. In our system the bulk region is comparable in size to the pore space and bulk condensation is nucleated as soon as the pore is filled with liquid.…”
Section: Static Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Usually such states are not accessible in experiments because bulk condensation occurs without any metastability. A notable exception is work by Easton and Machin [15] for water in graphitized carbon black where special precautions were taken to delay water condensation in the sample cell. In our system the bulk region is comparable in size to the pore space and bulk condensation is nucleated as soon as the pore is filled with liquid.…”
Section: Static Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our system the bulk region is comparable in size to the pore space and bulk condensation is nucleated as soon as the pore is filled with liquid. Presumably this did not happen in the Easton and Machin [15] experiment because of the small size of the porous material sample relative to the bulk region of the sample cell. In studying desorption we switched the bulk over to vapor once the bulk saturation state is reached.…”
Section: Static Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 1946) and on NC-1 (data of Pierce et al, 1949) Harkins and co-workers (1946) and Pierce and co-workers (1949) studied water adsorption on (presumably) non-porous graphite and found that the isotherms were typical of those expected for graphitized carbon (Figure 15b). The distinction between adsorption on a surface and in a pore can be seen at the onset of adsorption which, for a highly graphitized surface, does not occur until the pressure is close to the saturation vapour pressure (or even beyond, Easton and Machin, 2000). By contrast, adsorption in porous carbons begins at a lower pressure, which can be attributed either to the larger concentration of functional groups or to the nucleation of clusters from water trapped in very small pores (Nguyen and Bhatia, 2011) and the ease with which clusters can grow and merge due to the proximity of the pore walls (Emmett et al, 1948).…”
Section: Water Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption experiments of Easton and Machin 134 for water on highly graphitized thermal carbon black show that adsorption does not occur at pressures lower than the saturation vapour pressure 134 because, like ammonia, the dispersion interaction between water and basal plane is very weak. This is confirmed by a number of simulation studies of water on basal graphite surfaces 110,135,136 .…”
Section: Adsorption Of Other Adsorbates On Gtcbmentioning
confidence: 98%