Dynamic experiments provide an opportunity to determine, separately, values of the adsorption and surface reaction rates occurring in a heterogeneous, catalytic reaction. In this method it is not necessary to assume that either adsorption, surface reaction, or desorption controls the rate, in contrast to the procedure used for analyzing steady state rate data.The dynamic method is applied to experimental data for the oxidation of sulfur dioxide in a three-phase aqueous-slurry reactor using activated carbon as the catalyst. The results for 274.5 K show that both rates of reversible adsorption of oxygen and the subsequent, irreversible surface reaction affect the overall rate. Neither process can be considered to be controlling.The data required for the analysis are the zero and first moments of the response in the effluent gas to a disturbance in the feed, the adsorption equilibrium constant for oxygen, and appropriate mass transfer coefficients.
SCOPEThe usual procedure-the Hougen and Watson (1947) method-for analyzing steady state rate data for heterogeneous, catalytic reactions is to assume one process to be controlling in the sequence of adsorption, surface reaction, and desorption. Without this assumption the analytical expressions for the rate become too cumbersome to use. Perhaps more important, steady state data cannot provide information about the magnitudes of rates of the individual processes.When one process is assumed to be slow, the others occur at near-equilibrium. Then the rate equation formulated by the Hougen and Watson method includes equilibrium constants for these processes. Hence, an indirect way to test the assumption of a single processs controlling the overall rate is to compare separately determined equilibrium constants, for example for adsorption, with the values for these constants that must be used in the Hougen and Watson equation to correlate the rate data. Most such comparisons have been unsuccessful, leading to the conclusion that the so-called equilibrium constants in the Hougen and Watson equations are best regarded as empirical constants. However, Kabel and Johanson (1962) and Raghavan and Doraiswamy (1977) have found satisfactory agreement between adsorption equilibrium constants determined separately and by correlating steady state rate data.As pointed out by Bennett (1967Bennett ( ,1976, dynamic experiments provide an opportunity to avoid the controlling-process assumption, since adsorption, surface reaction, and desorption can occur at different rates during the transient period. During this period adsorbed concentrations as well as fluid-phase values are changing with time. At steady state, such concentrations are constant and the rates of adsorption, surface reaction, and desorption are identical.Our objective was to develop the dynamic method for a slurry reactor and use it with experimental data to determine reaction rates for the individual processes. Solution of the equations describing reaction under dynamic conditions in the real time domain is difficult. However, s...