“…The presence of different functional groups in carbon-based materials or their modified activated surface enhances the adsorption capacity for specific contaminants. Several bio-based adsorbents such as stem of acacia nilotica (Baig et al 2010) bagasse fly ash-iron coated and sponge iron char (Yadav et al 2014), anaerobic sludge biomass (Chowdhury and Mulligan 2011), coconut husk carbon (Manju et al 1998), Fe(III)-activated biomass of staphylococcus xylosus (Aryal et al 2010), activated red mud (Soner Altundogan et al 2002), sorghum biomass (Haque et al 2007), chitosan-coated biosorbent (Boddu et al 2008), iron oxide-coated biomass (Pokhrel and Viraraghavan 2008), fungal biomass (Say et al 2003), biochar by-products from fast wood/bark pyrolysis ) shelled moringaoleifera seeds (Kumari et al 2006), ralstoniaeutropha MTCC 2487 with activated carbon (Mondal et al 2008), cashew nut shale (Dora et al 2013), modified sludge biomass (Ramteke and Gogate 2016), agricultural residue rice polish (Ranjan et al 2009a, b), Maugeotia genuflexa biomass (Sari et al 2011), sugarcane carbon (Roy et al 2014), waste rice husk (Amin et al 2006) have been investigated previously by various researchers for arsenic biosorption. However, most such sorbents are edible or can be used as a fodder for cattle.…”