2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10965-019-1705-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorptive removal of chromium(VI) using spherical resorcinol-formaldehyde beads prepared by inverse suspension polymerization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the AAM-MSMPM adsorbed the Cd(II) ions, the binding energy of C=O exhibited a blueshift of 4.03 eV, indicating that C had an obvious electron-receiving tendency [ 31 ]. The binding energy of N 1 s had a redshift of 0.09 eV, meaning that N has a noticeable tendency to lose electrons or share lone pair electrons [ 32 ], possibly because the five electrons in the outer layer of the N atom bonded in pairs, and the rest of the lone pair electrons could not easily form complexes with Cd(II) ions. During the process, N and Cd(II) ions shared electrons, decreasing N’s electron density, and increasing binding energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the AAM-MSMPM adsorbed the Cd(II) ions, the binding energy of C=O exhibited a blueshift of 4.03 eV, indicating that C had an obvious electron-receiving tendency [ 31 ]. The binding energy of N 1 s had a redshift of 0.09 eV, meaning that N has a noticeable tendency to lose electrons or share lone pair electrons [ 32 ], possibly because the five electrons in the outer layer of the N atom bonded in pairs, and the rest of the lone pair electrons could not easily form complexes with Cd(II) ions. During the process, N and Cd(II) ions shared electrons, decreasing N’s electron density, and increasing binding energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods have their own disadvantages of high cost, generation of secondary pollutants, less adaptability toward water from a variety of sources, and sensitivity toward pH change, which make them restricted to some of the metal ions. Adsorption is a well-developed process and has an edge over these methods due to its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and applicability to all types of metal ions. There is a large amount of published research literature, where a variety of bioadsorbents (rice husk, chitosan/bentonite composites, , chitosan beads, alginate beads, groundnut shell, biomass gasifier waste materials, tea leaf biomass, and biochar), organic sorbents (α-FeOOH, iminodiacetic acid cation-exchange resin, resorcinol–formaldehyde beads, imidazole-functionalized adsorbents), organic polymers and composites (porous organic polymers, polyaniline-doped sulfuric acid, polypyrrole/monodisperse latex spheres, cellulose@PEI aerogel, NFe 3 O 4 starch-Glu-NFe 3 O 4 ED, and silica-based inorganic–organic hybrid materials), metal–organic frameworks (Cu­(I)-MOF@Fe 3 O 4 , ZIF-67 MOF@-aminated chitosan beads), metal oxides (Fe/Mn binary oxides, Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles hybridized with carbonaceous materials, ferric hydroxide/oxohydroxides), and core@shell particles (polypyrrole attapulgite core–shells, Fe@Fe 2 O 3 core–shell nanowires) have been employed for the adsorptive removal of Cr­(VI) and various other heavy metal ions . To the best of our knowledge, intermetallic compounds are still untouched in this field despite their superior properties, such as high thermal and structural stability, hardness, corrosion, chemical resistance, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photocatalysts are commonly considered as the most promising and frequently used feasible strategy, owing to its easy operation, eco-friendly, low cost, regeneration, and high performance when compared to other approaches [16,17]. Various photocatalyst for the removal of Cr (VI) have been investigated, including active carbon [18], metal oxide nanoparticles [19,20], synthesized polymer beads [21] and agriculture waste [22]. Among these, iron oxide (Fe 3 O 4 ) is one of the most widely studied due to its high efficiency, chemical stability, low cost, and availability [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%