2015
DOI: 10.1118/1.4932222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adult abdomen–pelvis CT: Does equilibrium dose‐pitch product better account for the kVp dependence of organ dose than conventional CTDI?

Abstract: In adult abdomen-pelvis CT, equilibrium dose-pitch product better accounts for the kVp dependence of organ dose than CTDI100.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where nT denotes the nominal collimation of the beam. This approach to simulating and calculating CTDI 100 was also used in an earlier study, 12 which found good agreement between simulations and measurements. In addition to CTDI 100 at individual hole locations, the planar average CTDI 100 (i.e., an average over the cross-sectional area of the phantom), denoted as CTDI xsec , was also calculated using Eqs.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulations Of Ctdi 100 and Itsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where nT denotes the nominal collimation of the beam. This approach to simulating and calculating CTDI 100 was also used in an earlier study, 12 which found good agreement between simulations and measurements. In addition to CTDI 100 at individual hole locations, the planar average CTDI 100 (i.e., an average over the cross-sectional area of the phantom), denoted as CTDI xsec , was also calculated using Eqs.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulations Of Ctdi 100 and Itsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…hCTDI p i∕CTDI c also decreased with increasing kVp, consistent with the fact that a higher energy beam produces more uniform dose distribution. 12 3.2 Definition of CTDI w for Elliptical Phantoms Table 5 summarizes the solutions to Eq. (5) for various kVp and aspect ratios.…”
Section: Sample Values Of Ctdi 100 and Ctdi Xsecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monte Carlo calculation in the 10 cm air holes would be very time consuming in order to arrive at a statistical error of about 1-2%, because of the low density of air, which makes photon interactions less frequent, and, at the same time, because of the much greater electron range compared to PMMA. Applying a method already used by Boone (2007) and Li et al (2015b), photon interactions were simulated assuming the holes are filled with PMMA and the results were then transformed into air kerma using ratios between the mass-energy absorption coefficients (MEAC) of air and PMMA. Thereby, it is possible to do a calculation with 20 million source photons in about 15 minutes on a desktop computer with a Pentium CORE i7 processor achieving a statistical error of about 1%, also maintaining the above mentioned cut-off energies.…”
Section: Quantities In Ct Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationships between the organ dose to CTDI vol ratio and tube voltage were investigated by Li et al in a Monte Carlo simulation study with three patient models undergoing abdomen-pelvis scans on a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash scanner operated at 70-140 kV. 18 The scan length was 43 cm for the normal-weight and the overweight models (effective diameters 23.1 and 27.9 cm), and 47 cm for the obese model (effective diameter 36.4 cm). The results of the doses to liver, spleen, stomach, pancreas, kidneys, colon, small intestine, bladder, and ovaries indicated that the organ dose to CTDI vol ratios increased with tube voltage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%