1998
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adult attachment style and affect regulation: Strategic variations in subjective self–other similarity.

Abstract: Six studies examined the link between adult attachment style and subjective self-other similarity. In Studies 1-3, data were collected on representations of self-other similarity in the realms of traits and opinions. Studies 4-5 examined the effects of affective inductions on the link between attachment and self-other similarity. Study 6 examined the cognitive maneuvers people differing in attachment style use for changing self-other similarity upon distress arousal. Whereas avoidant persons underestimated sel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
135
2
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(55 reference statements)
11
135
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the evidence is consistent with our model. People higher in anxious-ambivalence are more likely to turn to others for help with regulating their negative feelings, whereas those who are more avoidant distance themselves from others (e.g., Collins & Feeney, 2000;Mikulincer, 1998;Mikulincer, Florian, & Weller, 1993;Mikulincer, Orbach, & Iavnieli, 1998;Ognibene & Collins, 1998;Pietromonaco & Feldman Barrett, in press;Simpson, Rholes, & Nelligan, 1992). Indeed, for people high in attachment anxiety, the experimental activation of attachment security (i.e., via subliminally priming the word "love"), which may evoke a representation of an attachment figure, appears to provide a comforting or soothing effect by reducing the accessibility of terror-related words (Mikulincer, Shaver, & Horesh, this volume).…”
Section: Empirical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the evidence is consistent with our model. People higher in anxious-ambivalence are more likely to turn to others for help with regulating their negative feelings, whereas those who are more avoidant distance themselves from others (e.g., Collins & Feeney, 2000;Mikulincer, 1998;Mikulincer, Florian, & Weller, 1993;Mikulincer, Orbach, & Iavnieli, 1998;Ognibene & Collins, 1998;Pietromonaco & Feldman Barrett, in press;Simpson, Rholes, & Nelligan, 1992). Indeed, for people high in attachment anxiety, the experimental activation of attachment security (i.e., via subliminally priming the word "love"), which may evoke a representation of an attachment figure, appears to provide a comforting or soothing effect by reducing the accessibility of terror-related words (Mikulincer, Shaver, & Horesh, this volume).…”
Section: Empirical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Team identification explains the link between the need to belong and the emotional attachment to people and objects that are linked to the same shared social identity (Baumeister & Leary, 1995;Hogg & Turner, 1985;Prentice, Miller, & Lightdale, 1994). In fact, sharing a social identity has been shown to be a strong facilitator of emotional attachment in groups (Mikulincer, Orbach, & Iavnieli, 1998;Rom & Mikulincer, 2003).…”
Section: Team Identification and Emotional Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one further fascinating adjunct, state elevations in psychopathy roused by territorial incursion, also have implications for the activation hypothesis of attachment theory [23][24][25][26]. Although results are preliminary (because a second experiment is required to test attachment anxiety and avoidance), state elevations in psychopathy might facilitate increases in directional heightening of anxiety and avoidance responses, yet without compromising secure attachment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second significant shift in the attachment literature occurred with the reductionism that grew out of theory from the activation hypothesis [23][24][25][26] and how it was applied to attachment theory. When the attachment system is activated under conditions of perceived threat significant difficulties emerge, such as disruption of attachment bonds, conflict, emotional difficulties and abandonment.…”
Section: Attachment Theory Core Constructs For Bridging With the Adapmentioning
confidence: 99%