Studies on circadian entrainment have traditionally been performed under controlled laboratory conditions. Although these studies have served the purpose of providing a broad framework for our understanding of regulation of rhythmic behaviors under cyclic conditions, they do not reveal how organisms keep time in nature. Although a few recent studies have attempted to address this, it is not yet clear which environmental factors regulate rhythmic behaviors in nature and how. Here, we report the results of our studies aimed at examining (i) whether and how changes in natural light affect activity/rest rhythm and (ii) what the functional significance of this rhythmic behavior might be. We found that wild-type strains of fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, display morning (M), afternoon (A), and evening (E) peaks of activity under seminatural conditions (SN), whereas under constant darkness in otherwise SN, they exhibited M and E peaks, and under constant light in SN, only the E peak occurred. Unlike the A peak, which requires exposure to bright light in the afternoon, light information is dispensable for the M and E peaks. Visual examination of behaviors suggests that the M peak is associated with courtship-related locomotor activity and the A peak is due to an artifact of the experimental protocol and largely circadian clock independent.circadian rhythms | chronoethogram | courtship | period mutants | afternoon peak T he role of circadian clocks in the temporal regulation of behaviors has been studied mostly under controlled laboratory conditions (1). Because simplified laboratory protocols are far removed from the reality of nature, these studies are limited in their ability to reveal the true features of circadian behavior in nature. For instance, laboratory studies mostly use square waves of one zeitgeber (time cue) such as light or temperature, or in rare cases, a combination of the two, quite unlike multiple, simultaneous, stochastic, and gradually changing factors in nature (2-6). Few recent studies on activity/rest and adult emergence rhythms of fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, under seminatural (SN) conditions reported significant differences in the patterns of these rhythms from those observed in the laboratory (2-6). For instance, adult emergence rhythm was more robust under SN compared with the laboratory, and even the period null (per 0 ) flies exhibited rhythmicity (3). An additional afternoon (A) peak of activity was reported under SN (4), which had never been observed in any standard laboratory protocol. Several features of the activity/rest rhythm (anticipation to twilight transitions and midday siesta) were absent under SN, and certain features of the rhythm such as crepuscular pattern and dominance of light over temperature were proposed to be artifacts of laboratory studies (4). The temporal profiles of neuronal expression of clock proteins, PERIOD and TIMELESS were also found to differ between laboratory and nature (6).At present, the available literature is limited to descriptions of rh...