Adult health outcomes and their implications for experiences of childhood nutritional stress in Jamaica

Abstract

With insights from the developmental origins of health and disease paradigm (DOHaD), this study explores the impact of childhood nutritional stress on adult health outcomes in Jamaica. Jamaica experienced a lengthy period of political and economic instability beginning in the postcolonial period of the early 1960s. This study tests whether decreased government spending on public resources and limited access to imported food products during the early postcolonial period will be reflected in increased adiposity and body mass index among Jamaican adults. Ethnographic and anthropometric data were collected from individuals born between 1958 and 1988. Variability in health outcomes was assessed using Z-score values for body mass index and summed skinfold thickness measures. Age was employed as both a continuous and categorical independent variable. In partial correlation models controlling for economic status, body mass index values and summed skinfold thickness increased with age. Birth cohort and gender effects were also apparent. Women born between 1959 and 1968 had higher body mass index Z-score values than younger women. Both men and women born between 1959 and 1968 had significantly higher skinfold thickness measures than younger individuals. Individuals born between 1959 and 1968 were children during the immediate postcolonial era in Jamaica. Experiences of nutritional stress during critical developmental periods may have contributed to the observed age-related increases in adipose tissue and body mass index values. This study informs our understanding of the ways that fluctuations in the sociopolitical environment during development can mediate and contribute to poor adult health outcomes.

Bone density and frame size in adult women: Effects of body size, habitual use, and life history

“…Correlations between age and SoS were not significant and quite small compared to our 95% confidence intervals, suggesting that if there is a small effect, it would require a very large sample size to distinguish it from zero. As expected from the literature ((Nelson, 2009; Wells, Griffin, & Treleaven, 2010), we find BMI and body fat increase with age. We also found that our measurement of frame size, wrist breadth, also increased with age.…”

Don't blame the BAME: Ethnic and structural inequalities in susceptibilities to COVID‐19

“…We should also remember that developmental and epigenetic influences mediated through the environment (socioeconomic and otherwise) can also impact individuals in later life and, through this route, affect their susceptibility to pathogens (Conching & Thayer, 2019; Nelson, 2009; Wells, 2016). South Asians, for example, are suggested to have a particular thin‐fat phenotype in response to long‐standing conditions of fetal under‐nutrition that render them particularly vulnerable to metabolic disorders in later life (Yajnik et al, 2003.…”

An integrative approach to studying plasticity in growth disruption and outcomes: A bioarchaeological case study of Napoleonic soldiers

“…This research paradigm arose from epidemiological observations connecting low birth size and early postnatal life circumstances to increased risk of cardiovascular disease later in life and other negative adult health outcomes (Barker, 2012; Barker & Osmond, 1986). This research paradigm has been taken up by bioarchaeologists and human biologists to capture the relationship between intrauterine and postnatal “stress” events with morbidity and mortality later in life (eg, Armelagos, Goodman, Harper, & Blakey, 2009; Benyshek, 2013; Garland, 2020; Gowland, 2015; Kuzawa & Sweet, 2009; Lucock et al, 2019; Nelson, 2009; Weisensee, 2013). In the context of LHT and growth outcomes, DOHaD provides an explanatory framework for the potential costs of stress‐induced growth disruptions across the life course.…”