2009
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.3303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adult intussusception: A retrospective review of 41 cases

Abstract: AIM:To optimize the preoperative diagnosis and surgical management of adult intussusception (AI). METHODS:A retrospective review of the clinical features, diagnosis, management and pathology 41 adult patients with postoperative diagnoses of intussusception was conducted. RESULTS:Forty-one patients with 44 intussusceptions were operated on, 24.4% had acute symptoms, 24.4% had subacute symptoms, and 51.2% had chronic symptoms. 70.7% of the patients presented with intestinal obstruction. There were 20 enteric, 15… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

10
275
0
12

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
10
275
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In a retrospective review of 41 pediatric intussusception cases, 95.1% had abdominal pain, 26.8% had bloody stool and 34.1% had a palpable abdominal mass. However, the classic triad presentation was only seen in 9.8% of the adult patients in the study [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In a retrospective review of 41 pediatric intussusception cases, 95.1% had abdominal pain, 26.8% had bloody stool and 34.1% had a palpable abdominal mass. However, the classic triad presentation was only seen in 9.8% of the adult patients in the study [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The primary imaging modality of choice is ultrasound scanning, which enables the diagnosis or exclusion of intussusception with a sensitivity of 98-100%, specificity of 88-89% and negative predictive value of 100%. 3,4 The majority of intussusceptions are diagnosed at surgery. In our case, the preoperative clinical findings and ultrasonic images suggested intussusception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barium enema examination may be useful in patients with colonic or ileocolic intussusception in which a cup-shaped filling defect is a characteristic finding [9] . Colonoscopy is also a useful tool for evaluating intussusception, especially when the presenting symptoms indicate a large bowel obstruction [4,10,11,12] . It may not be advisable to perform endoscopic biopsy or polypectomy in those individuals with long-term symptoms because of the high risk of perforation, which is more likely to happen in the phase of chronic tissue ischemia, and perhaps necrosis because of vascular compromise in intussusception [13] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%