Adult low-risk drinkers and abstainers are not the same

Abstract

Background: Alcohol consumption, even at low-levels, can not be guaranteed as safe or risk free. Specifically, the 2009 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council drinking guidelines recommend that adults should not drink more than two standard drinks on any day on average, and no more than four drinks on a single occasion. Nearly 40% of Australians aged 12 years and older drink alcohol but don't exceed these recommended limits, yet adult low-risk drinkers have been largely overlooked in Australian alcohol survey research, where they are usually grouped with abstainers. This paper examines the socio-demographic profile of low-risk drinking adults (18+ years old), compared to those who abstain. Methods: Data from the 2013 National Drug Strategy Household Survey were used. In the past 12 months, 4796 Australians had not consumed alcohol and 8734 had consumed alcohol at low-risk levels, accounting for both average volume and episodic drinking (hereafter low-risk). Results: Multivariate logistic regression results indicated that low-risk drinkers were more likely to be older, married, Australian-born, and reside in a less disadvantaged neighbourhood compared with abstainers. There was no significant difference by sex between low-risk drinkers and abstainers. Conclusions: The socio-demographic profile of low-risk drinkers differed from that of abstainers. Combining lowrisk drinkers and abstainers into a single group, which is often the practice in survey research, may mask important differences. The study may support improved targeting of health promotion initiatives that encourage low-risk drinkers not to increase consumption or, in view of increasing evidence that low-risk drinking is not risk free, to move towards abstinence.

Reaction Time and Visual Memory in Connection to Alcohol Use in Persons with Bipolar Disorder

“…Study findings suggesting association between alcohol consumption and better performance in cognitive testing could be attributed by unmeasured or residual confounding factors [ 90 , 91 ] like smoking [ 92 ], drink type [ 93 ], drink pattern [ 94 ], personality [ 92 , 95 ], intelligence [ 96 , 97 ], educational attainment [ 98 , 99 ], potential abstainer errors [ 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 ], reverse causality bias [ 104 ], recall error [ 105 ], within person temporal variation [ 106 , 107 ]. Study findings suggesting negative association between alcohol and cognition could be attributed by poor motivation [ 108 , 109 , 110 ].…”

Reaction Time and Visual Memory in Connection with Alcohol Use in Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder

“…Study findings suggesting a positive association between alcohol use and cognition could be attributed to unmeasured or residual confounding factors [ 79 , 80 ], such as smoking [ 81 ], drink types [ 82 ], drinking patterns [ 83 ], personality [ 81 , 84 ], intelligence [ 70 , 85 , 86 ], educational attainment [ 87 , 88 ], potential abstainer errors [ 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 ], reverse causality bias [ 93 ], recall error [ 94 ], within-person temporal variation [ 95 , 96 ], ascertainment of diseases [ 97 ], and the sociability effect of alcohol [ 98 ]. Study findings suggesting a positive association between alcohol use and cognition could be attributed to poor motivation [ 99 , 100 , 101 ].…”

Reaction Time and Visual Memory in Connection to Alcohol Use In Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder

“…Study findings suggesting positive association between alcohol and cognition could be attributed by unmeasured or residual confounding factors [85,86] like: smoking [87], drink type [88], drink pattern [89], personality [87,90], intelligence [76,91,92], educational attainment [93,94], potential abstainer errors [95,96,97,98], reverse causality bias [99], recall error [100] within person temporal variation [101,102], ascertainment of diseases [103] and sociability effect of alcohol [104]. Study findings suggesting positive association between alcohol and cognition could be attributed by poor motivation [105,106,107].…”