2011
DOI: 10.1080/08824096.2011.565276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adult Siblings' Use of Affectionate Communication as a Strategic and Routine Relational Maintenance Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, considering the clear positive association that has been found between these relational characteristics and the use of relational maintenance behaviors in previous investigations coupled with the notion that affectionate communication can be used as a type of relational maintenance behavior (Floyd, 2006;Myers et al, 2011), it stands to reason that similar relationships may exist in the GP-GC relationship. Also, AET posits that affectionate communication may have positive impacts on the receivers' perceptions of their partners and their relationships.…”
Section: Communication Reports 49mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, considering the clear positive association that has been found between these relational characteristics and the use of relational maintenance behaviors in previous investigations coupled with the notion that affectionate communication can be used as a type of relational maintenance behavior (Floyd, 2006;Myers et al, 2011), it stands to reason that similar relationships may exist in the GP-GC relationship. Also, AET posits that affectionate communication may have positive impacts on the receivers' perceptions of their partners and their relationships.…”
Section: Communication Reports 49mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This postulate is indicative of two general assumptions. First, affectionate communication can be used as a type of relational maintenance behavior (Floyd, 2006;Myers, Byrnes, Frisby, & Mansson, 2011) in that it is associated positively with favorable relational characteristics in romantic relationships (Floyd, 2002;Horan & Booth-Butterfield, 2010). Second, this postulate applies to any type of relationship that ''involves a significant affectual bond'' (Floyd, 2006, p. 165), but it has only been tested in romantic relationships (Floyd, 2002;Horan & Booth-Butterfield, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The study found a relationship between the lower personal relevance of praise and greater cognitive disorganisation in schizotypy. Praise denotes affection, approval, and the need to establish closeness [52]. Maternal praise could boost the child's feelings of competence and confidence [16].…”
Section: Relationship Between Perceived Praise and Cognitive Disorganmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…been studied in conjunction with affection (Dainton, Stafford, & Canary, 1994;Guerrero & Bachman, 2006;Horan, 2013;Myers, Brann, & Rittenour, 2008;Myers, Byrnes, Frisby, & Mansson, 2011), less examined is the use of inauthentic affection as a tool for mate retention. Consequently, this study adds to the affection as maintenance research by uniquely examining the use of deceptive affection in a unique retention context-the adaptive problem of partner infidelity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%