‘Adults don’t understand’: exploring how teens use dialectical frameworks to navigate webs of tensions in online life

Redden, Shawna Malvini; Way, Amy K.

doi:10.1080/00909882.2016.1248465

Cited by 29 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The two researchers initially coded the transcripts independently to identify firstlevel codes. Then, researchers compared first-level codes and a 'consensus process' (Harry et al, 2005;Redden & Way, 2017) was utilized to identify meaningful common codes. Agreed-upon codes were turned into a shared codebook.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Communication scholar-activism: conceptualizing key dimensions and practices based on interviews with scholar-activists

Ramasubramanian

Sousa

2021

Journal of Applied Communication Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Communication scholar-activism: conceptualizing key dimensions and practices based on interviews with scholar-activists

Ramasubramanian

Sousa

2021

Journal of Applied Communication Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…These findings were compatible with findings from a study in 2017 [67], in which teenagers aged 14 to 18 were found to have more concerns over interpersonal contexts, but often failed to understand or perceive potential threats to their privacy from ways first and third parties might make use of their data, and how personal data could be used in predictive ways to shape their future experiences and behaviors. Children between 12-17 demonstrated some awareness of 'data traces' they left online [83] and of device tracking [53], but found it hard to make a personal connection or apply such knowledge to themselves [7].…”

Section: Children's Perceptions Of Datafication Onlinementioning

confidence: 99%

'Don't make assumptions about me!': Understanding Children's Perception of Datafication Online

Wang

Zhao

Kleek

et al. 2022

Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Datafication, which is the process in which children's actions online are pervasively recorded, tracked, aggregated, analysed, and exploited by online services in multiple ways that include behavioural engineering, and monetisation, is becoming increasing common in the online world today. However, we know little about how children feel about such practices and how they perceive datafication. Through online interviews with 48 children aged 7-13 from UK schools, we examined how children perceive datafication practices, especially how such practices could make inference on them. We identified three key knowledge gaps in children's perceptions, including their lack of recognition of who were involved in the data processing and how, data being transmitted across platforms, and their data ownership. Through situating our findings under a critical algorithmic literacy framework, our findings provided some immediate indications regarding how we could better support children in the datafied society through more transparency and autonomy-supportive designs, as well as the need for a fundamental shift of the current data governance structure.

show abstract

“…Although the available literature is marginal, research has identified several dialectics at the macro level of the social media ecosystem (Table 1). Redden and Way (2017) used focus groups to identify the dialectics emerging in social media among teenagers. They found that teens have multiple accounts in various social media platforms and the central dialectics emerged in this age group are staying connected online vs disconnecting , desire freedom/autonomy vs oversight and constraint , carefully curating an online persona vs carefree authenticity , the balance between online vs offline identity and participating vs resisting online culture and rituals .…”

Section: The Thesis-antithesis-synthesis-conflict Model Of Actor Engagement In the Social Media Ecosystemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Maintaining an individual identity vs adopting the identity of the brand community (Black and Selection coping strategy (Redden and Way, 2017) Desire freedom/autonomy vs oversight and constraint (Redden and Way, 2017) Disqualifying coping strategy (Redden and Way, 2017) Carefully curating an online persona vs carefree authenticity (Redden and Way, 2017) Segmentation coping strategy (Redden and Way, 2017) Balance between online vs offline identity (Redden and Way, 2017) Articulation of local logics of identity (Redden and Way, 2017) Participating vs resisting online culture and rituals (Redden and Way, 2017) Articulation of local logics of self-protection (Redden and Way, 2017) Relational maintenance (Redden and Way, 2017) Identity management (Redden and JetBlue's social outreach resulted in a significant increase in customer satisfaction scores illustrating the dialectical nature of actor-brand engagement in social media and how to value co-destruction can re-shape their relationships and, through a new thesis and antithesis, can lead to value co-creation.…”

Section: Marketingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Introducing relational dialectics on actor engagement in the social media ecosystem

Tsiotsou

2020

JSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide an in-depth understanding of actor engagement (AE) on social media by proposing a holistic and integrative conceptual framework. Design/methodology/approach Based on a sample of 118 articles, the paper draws on the service-dominant logic (SDL)-based service ecosystem perspective combined with the tenets of relational dialectics as theoretical lenses to inform AE research in social media. Findings The paper proposes a framework of AE in social media called the TASC model, an acronym of Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis-Conflict. TASC introduces the dialectical nature of AE and discusses the contexts and levels of AE in the social media ecosystem and their evolving processes. Practical implications Firms can apply the knowledge provided by TASC to gather marketing intelligence and develop marketing strategies to anticipate tensions, motivate the desired AE intensity and valence and reinforce value co-creation in the social media ecosystem. Originality/value TASC is a comprehensive framework that, for the first time, explains engagement at all levels of the social media ecosystem by combining the SDL-based service ecosystem view with the relational dialectics perspective.

show abstract

‘Adults don’t understand’: exploring how teens use dialectical frameworks to navigate webs of tensions in online life

Cited by 29 publications

References 29 publications

Communication scholar-activism: conceptualizing key dimensions and practices based on interviews with scholar-activists

Communication scholar-activism: conceptualizing key dimensions and practices based on interviews with scholar-activists

'Don't make assumptions about me!': Understanding Children's Perception of Datafication Online

Introducing relational dialectics on actor engagement in the social media ecosystem

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About