Advance care planning for frail elderly: are we missing a golden opportunity? A mixed-method systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim is to integrate quantitative and qualitative evidence to understand the effectiveness and experience of advance care planning (ACP) for frail elderly.DesignA mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Quality evaluation was conducted using critical appraisal tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data were synthesised and pooled for meta-analysis or meta-aggregation as needed.Data sourcesAn electronic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases from January 2003 to April 2022.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesWe included experimental and mixed-methods studies. The quantitative component attempts to incorporate a broader study design. The qualitative component aids in comprehending the participant’s experience with ACP and its efficacy.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent reviewers undertook screening, data extraction and quality assessment. The quantitative and qualitative data were synthesised and integrated using a convergent segregated approach.ResultsThere were 12 158 articles found, and 17 matched the inclusion criteria. The quality of the quantitative component of most included studies (6/10) was rated as low, and the qualitative component of half included studies (4/8) was rated as moderate. The meta-analysis showed that the intervention of ACP for frail elderly effectively increases readiness, knowledge and process of ACP behaviours. The meta-aggregation showed that the participants hold a positive attitude towards ACP and think it facilitates expressing their preferences for the medical decision.ConclusionACP is an effective and feasible strategy to facilitate frail elderly to express their healthcare wishes timely and improve their outcomes. This study could provide proof for a better understanding of the subject and help direct future clinical practice. More well-designed randomised controlled trials evaluating the most effective ACP interventions and tools are needed for the frail elderly population.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022329615.

Exploration of decision aids to support advance care planning: A scoping review

“…This review aims to provide an overview of decision aids currently used for ACP, including different types of tools and a comprehensive comparative analysis of their content and effectiveness, guided by international consensus on acknowledged standards (Rietjens et al, 2017). Previous reviews did not focus on the type and characteristics of the aids, the basis for decision-making, whether the development process conformed to standards and the content of the tools, but rather on the feasibility and effectiveness of the tools in terms of tapping into the effectiveness of the application (Aslakson et al, 2015;Jain et al, 2015;Nayfeh et al, 2022;Shu et al, 2023;Wang et al, 2023). We have now added an overview of patient satisfaction with decision aids.…”