1993
DOI: 10.1097/00007611-199302000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advance Directives on Hospital Admission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6] Th erefore, discussions about life-sustaining treatments, including CPR, in the outpatient setting before older patients become acutely ill are important, and patients and family members value shared decision-making. [7][8][9][10][11] Additionally, patients with chronic disease present a unique opportunity for end-of-life discussions because they are more likely to have contact with health-care providers in outpatient settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] Th erefore, discussions about life-sustaining treatments, including CPR, in the outpatient setting before older patients become acutely ill are important, and patients and family members value shared decision-making. [7][8][9][10][11] Additionally, patients with chronic disease present a unique opportunity for end-of-life discussions because they are more likely to have contact with health-care providers in outpatient settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Both patients and physicians feel that advance directives are important and should be discussed. 1,6±8 Yet we, 9 as well as others, 1,7,8 have shown that such discussions are uncommon. Patients often feel it is their physicians' responsibility to initiate advance care discussions, while physicians believe the subject should be raised by their patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This reality stands in sharp contrast to the North American experience, where the past 20 years have seen dynamic developments in terms of both the legislation and research. In many cases, the North American studies have indicated large gaps between the available knowledge about and awareness of the existence of these tools and their actual use (Broadwell, Boisaubin, Dunn, & Engelhardt, 1993;Larson, & Eaton, 1997;Miller, 1999). One of the recent studies in this regard was conducted by the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) in 1999; its findings revealed a significant improvement in the rate of use of legal planning tools in comparison with their use in the 1980s or early 1990s (AARP, 2000; hereinafter, "the AARP study").…”
Section: Study Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%