2003
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2003.1232246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced DSL management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 illustrates the DSL copper impairments (Kerpez et al, 2003) (Starr et al, 2003), which are mainly loop and bridged tap loss, crosstalk, electromagnetic interference (EMI) radio ingress, impulse noise, harmonic distortion, and background noise.…”
Section: Dsl Copper Impairmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 illustrates the DSL copper impairments (Kerpez et al, 2003) (Starr et al, 2003), which are mainly loop and bridged tap loss, crosstalk, electromagnetic interference (EMI) radio ingress, impulse noise, harmonic distortion, and background noise.…”
Section: Dsl Copper Impairmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shaded region indicates the autonomous operation of the N modems to establish the local parameters such as PSD and bit allocation over sub-carriers. The center and modems only exchange the global parameters such as i M γ and i P , which makes MHM a Level-1 DSM technique [5]. All modems initially start at their maximum power constraint max P as in [6].…”
Section: Implementation In Current Dsl Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal noise and crosstalk fall into the category of capacity limiting noise and is effectively dealt with by Dynamic Spectrum Management (DSM) [4] techniques. Level-1 coordination [5] DSM schemes such as the game theoretic Iterated Water-Filling (IWF) [6] are most popular [4] [7], due to their predominantly distributed nature and significant rate enhancement from Static Spectrum Management (SSM) techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This realization has recently fueled intense research activity in Dynamic Spectrum Management (DSM) [6], [8], [20], which seeks to jointly optimize transmit spectra in order to minimize crosstalk, and hence to improve the achievable rates. Based on the required amount of coordination and centralized control, DSM techniques can be classified from Level 1 to Level 3 1 [7]. In Level 1, only macro parameters such as data rates, total transmit power, and margin are reported and controlled centrally and other micro parameters such as actual subcarrier-specific power and rate allocation are autonomously managed by each individual user modem in a distributed manner [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the required amount of coordination and centralized control, DSM techniques can be classified from Level 1 to Level 3 1 [7]. In Level 1, only macro parameters such as data rates, total transmit power, and margin are reported and controlled centrally and other micro parameters such as actual subcarrier-specific power and rate allocation are autonomously managed by each individual user modem in a distributed manner [7]. Level-1 DSM schemes are desired for their lowest requirements of coordination and centralized control, especially when multiple competing service providers share the bundle in current DSL scenarios.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%