We investigated the performance of several carbon-supported Ru x Pt y electrocatalysts for their alkaline hydrogen oxidation and oxygen reduction performance in the presence of carbonate and compared their performance with monometallic, carbon-supported Pt. Our results indicate a strong dependence of HOR upon pH for the monometallic Pt catalysts (22 mV/pH) and a weak dependence upon pH for the Ru-containing electrocatalysts (3.7, 2.5, and 4.7 mV/pH on Ru 0.2 Pt 0.8 , Ru 0.4 Pt 0.6 , and Ru 0.8 Pt 0.2 , respectively). These results are consistent with our previous findings that illustrate a change in rds from electron transfer (on monometallic Pt) to dissociative hydrogen adsorption (on Ru x Pt y catalysts). Analysis of the kinetic currents to determine the rate-determining step via Tafel slope analysis provides additional data supporting this conclusion. There is no difference in the performance at comparable pH values in the presence or absence of carbonate on monometallic Pt indicating that water/hydroxide is the primary proton acceptor for alkaline HOR in 0.1 M KOH aqueous electrolyte. Finally, we observe no pH or carbonate dependence for the ORR on Ruthenium-platinum nanomaterials are currently the best performing alkaline hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR) catalysts in fuel cells.1 Their improved activity vs. platinum has been realized through the understanding and application of ligand and bi-functional effects to reduce the metal-hydrogen, M-H, binding energy of Pt and to improve H ads reactivity with adsorbed hydroxyl groups, OH ads . [1][2][3][4] Hydrogen oxidation on Pt electrocatalyst is sensitive to pH because the rate-determining step is concerted electron/proton transfer (Volmer/Heyrovsky step).3,5 However, we have demonstrated on RuPt alloy catalysts that the rds changes to the pH-insensitive hydrogen dissociative adsorption (Tafel step). The impact of pH and carbonate on Ru-Pt alloy catalysts, consequently, remains unresolved for HOR in an alkaline environment.It is well documented that carbon dioxide in air partitions into the aqueous alkaline electrolyte at the cathode as carbonate and is purged at the anode during fuel cell operation.6-8 Carbonate has not been demonstrated to poison the anode catalyst; however, alkaline carbonate has been proposed as an active proton acceptor, 9 according to Eq. 1, competitive with hydroxide, Eq. 2.It has been suggested by some authors that because of water's ability to rapidly self-associate/dissociate that it is an active participant in the oxidation of H ads during alkaline hydrogen oxidation. Water is the major component of the electrolytic environment in both traditional, three-electrode electrochemical cells and in solid polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Consequently, if water is an active participant in the HOR, concentration effects should mask the contribution of carbonate. Resolving this question has important implications for modeling the alkaline fuel cell environment, as well as developing improved catalysts. * Electrochemical Society Active Member.*...