2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Electrostatic Model for Monovalent Ions Based on Ab Initio Energy Decomposition

Abstract: Ions play important roles in the structures and functions of biomolecules. In biomolecular simulations, ions either directly interact with biomolecules or provide an ionic environment that influences electrostatic interactions of solutes. The AMOEBA+ water model has demonstrated significant advancement of the classical force field for describing molecular interactions due to its improvements on the functional forms to account for essential physics. This work expands the applicability of the AMOEBA+ model towar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, significant interest has arisen with respect to the influence of polarizability on the structure and dynamics of soft matter systems. Broadly, there are three primary methods for explicitly accounting for the effects of electronic polarization in classical simulations, namely, the induced point dipole, fluctuating charge, and the Drude oscillator models. ,, The total electrostatic energy of the induced point dipole system contains the charge–charge, charge–dipole, and dipole–dipole interactions, with the point dipole on a given atom calculated using an iterative self-consistent field (SCF) procedure. The fluctuating charge model allows the charges on individual molecules to dynamically change according to the electronegativity of each atom in the molecule. The Drude oscillator model attaches a ghost (Drude) particle to its host (core) particle with a harmonic spring, and then the mass and partial charge of the true atom are divided into the Drude and core portions. ,, In general, in comparison to the traditional nonpolarizable force field (fixed charge) model, all of the polarizable models introduce additional degrees of freedom to be solved self-consistently during the simulation, which increases the computational expense and serves to explain the relatively fewer number of studies employing such a framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, significant interest has arisen with respect to the influence of polarizability on the structure and dynamics of soft matter systems. Broadly, there are three primary methods for explicitly accounting for the effects of electronic polarization in classical simulations, namely, the induced point dipole, fluctuating charge, and the Drude oscillator models. ,, The total electrostatic energy of the induced point dipole system contains the charge–charge, charge–dipole, and dipole–dipole interactions, with the point dipole on a given atom calculated using an iterative self-consistent field (SCF) procedure. The fluctuating charge model allows the charges on individual molecules to dynamically change according to the electronegativity of each atom in the molecule. The Drude oscillator model attaches a ghost (Drude) particle to its host (core) particle with a harmonic spring, and then the mass and partial charge of the true atom are divided into the Drude and core portions. ,, In general, in comparison to the traditional nonpolarizable force field (fixed charge) model, all of the polarizable models introduce additional degrees of freedom to be solved self-consistently during the simulation, which increases the computational expense and serves to explain the relatively fewer number of studies employing such a framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scaled charge strategy by electronic continuum correction described the electronic polarization in nonpolarizable force fields. For polarizable ion models, a different form (buffered 14-7 potential) was adopted to represent the vdW interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of this, the systematic difference of 17 kcal/mol between AMOEBA and SAPT0 + MBD values of E int in bulk water (see Table 1) is not so dissimilar from previous results. Improvements to the AMOEBA force field for ions, using SAPT energy components as benchmark data, is a topic of contemporary interest [97][98][99].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%