2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Machine Learning techniques for fake news (online disinformation) detection: A systematic mapping study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, to the best of our knowledge, there are only five references, namely, Refs. [28][29][30][31], which have introduced the SMS methodology for conducting literature review on fake news detection. In what follows, we describe each of these references in order to identify its advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, to the best of our knowledge, there are only five references, namely, Refs. [28][29][30][31], which have introduced the SMS methodology for conducting literature review on fake news detection. In what follows, we describe each of these references in order to identify its advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of this SMS indicated that most studies focus on providing solutions to detect misinformation spread on social media platforms. In [29], the authors have presented a systematic mapping study related to fake news detection based machine learning techniques. The objective of the proposed SMS is analyzing the current state the research on machine learning techniques used to combat fake news phenomenon and identifying the main challenges and methodological gaps to motivate future research.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former ones are actually fake news, but the latter ones, even if are close to fake news, are characterized by the entirely different intentions of the author. As highlighted by [11], the difference between the two is very subtle. It is sometimes difficult even for people to distinguish between them, particularly those who do not have a particular sense of humor.…”
Section: Fake News Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the latest techniques arising, there is the detection of non-common tokens, specific text elements, repeated words, question and exclamation marks, emoticons, etc. [11]. These are usually neglected during the traditional preprocessing phase of the text.…”
Section: Text Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies aim to identify all relevant evidence on the topic/area or research question. Up to now, many such studies were published in Computer Science journals or conferences [48][49][50][51]. They are found to be useful for educational purposes as well, providing a good starting point for a PhD work [52].…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%