Advanced manufacturing technology and work design: Towards a theoretical framework

Abstract

This paper introduces a theoretical framework to guide research into the psychological effects of advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) on shopfloor operators. The framework has two main aspects. First, based on the emerging literature on the job content implications of AMT, it identifies four key constructs, namely: control, cognitive demand, production responsibility and social interaction. Second, by drawing on the more established job design, stress and related literatures, it predicts how these independent variables differentially affect system performance, job‐related strain and job satisfaction. The wider implications and limitations of the theoretical framework are discussed.

Inspiring crowdsourcing communities to create novel solutions: Competition design and the mediating role of trust

“…Problem solving involves generating unique or innovative ideas or solutions, diagnosing and solving non-routine problems, and preventing or recovering from errors (Jackson et al, 1993, Wall et al, 1990. As with complexity, we expect problem solving to have a positive impact on intrinsic motivation as the quest for new codes and algorithms helps data scientists to gain a sense of competence and self-expression Kruglanski, 2000, Lakhani andWolf, 2003).…”

New Concepts for a New Age: Information Service Organizations and Mental Information Work

“…In the third place, little is yet known about the work, called MIW, in which mental activities dominate over physical activity, and tasks are being executed with computers and contacts with others are electronically mediated. A proper understanding of this work calls for new methods of analysis and 13 design (cf Wall et al, 1990;Meijer 8c Roe, 1993), and for new studies on the demands and the impacts experienced by the workers.…”

More Than What Was Asked for: Company Specific Competence Programs as Innovation Hothouses

“…Boxall and Purcell [11] argue that there are major differences in what is invested in employees between high-tech manufacturing companies, on the one hand, and labour-intensive, low-tech manufacturing industry on the other. Companies can profit from teaching operators to solve technical problems as they occur, instead of calling in specialist technicians for problem solving and delaying the production [12]. Because companies rely on skilled workers in high-tech manufacturing, workplace practices centred on employee participation are assumed to pay off.…”