Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
This paper details out the application of a predictive analysis tool to ‘S’ Field's commingled production, aiming to enhance production allocation and reservoir understanding without the need of well intervention and a reduced frequency of zonal rate tests and data acquisition. Allocation of the production data to its respective reservoirs is performed via a novel Multi-Phase Allocation method (MPA), taking into account the water production trending evolution derived from relative permeability behavior of oil-water in each reservoir to compute flow rates for liquid phases over time. The precision of the derived rates is constrained by actual zonal rates tests through Inflow Control Valves (ICVs). This method will be cross referenced against ‘S’ Field's existing zonal rate calculation algorithm, utilizing input data from well tests results and real time pressure and temperature data. The MPA method demonstrates improvement in the allocation of production data as compared to the conventional KH-methodology as MPA takes into account the water cut trending between reservoirs. Leveraging on ICVs to obtain actual zonal rate measurements, this greatly reduces the range of uncertainty in the allocation process. MPA derived production split ratios closely match the split ratios derived from the ‘S’ Field's existing zonal rate calculation algorithm, which utilizes input data from well tests results and real time pressure and temperature data from down hole gauges. It is observed that the usage of actual measured zonal rate tests reduces the range of uncertainty of the MPA data. A combination of novel multi-phase deliverability models coupled with smart field technologies such as intelligent completions and real-time surveillance and analysis tools will increase the accuracy of the back allocation of multi-phase production data in commingled reservoirs.
This paper details out the application of a predictive analysis tool to ‘S’ Field's commingled production, aiming to enhance production allocation and reservoir understanding without the need of well intervention and a reduced frequency of zonal rate tests and data acquisition. Allocation of the production data to its respective reservoirs is performed via a novel Multi-Phase Allocation method (MPA), taking into account the water production trending evolution derived from relative permeability behavior of oil-water in each reservoir to compute flow rates for liquid phases over time. The precision of the derived rates is constrained by actual zonal rates tests through Inflow Control Valves (ICVs). This method will be cross referenced against ‘S’ Field's existing zonal rate calculation algorithm, utilizing input data from well tests results and real time pressure and temperature data. The MPA method demonstrates improvement in the allocation of production data as compared to the conventional KH-methodology as MPA takes into account the water cut trending between reservoirs. Leveraging on ICVs to obtain actual zonal rate measurements, this greatly reduces the range of uncertainty in the allocation process. MPA derived production split ratios closely match the split ratios derived from the ‘S’ Field's existing zonal rate calculation algorithm, which utilizes input data from well tests results and real time pressure and temperature data from down hole gauges. It is observed that the usage of actual measured zonal rate tests reduces the range of uncertainty of the MPA data. A combination of novel multi-phase deliverability models coupled with smart field technologies such as intelligent completions and real-time surveillance and analysis tools will increase the accuracy of the back allocation of multi-phase production data in commingled reservoirs.
Quality of commingled production data and reliability of back-allocation from stacked reservoirs with numerous platforms, wells, and strings play an important role in reservoir simulation modeling for history matching and prediction. A long historical data, limited surveillance data including routine well tests, pressure, and PLT, relying on conventional back-allocation for high water-cut strings with tubing integrity issues are the common pain points. The pre-HM tool is developed to provide a reliable and clean dataset for modeling. Pre-HM tool includes advanced functionalities such as data quality index (DQI), areal-vertical multiphase allocation, integrated allocation, leak identification and quantification. DQI is designed for a systematic interpretation to identify missing data, potential errors, and outliers in historical data. Multi-phase allocation helps to improve areal and vertical allocation based on the water cut behavior type curve compared to the conventional KH-method. Integrated allocation is designed to handle the uncertainties associated with metering and back-allocation using the multi-solutions approach. Clustering and ranking processes for similar solutions are validated against material balance to propose the best solutions for modeling. This technology has been deployed in several fields to examine the capability of different modules on the dataset. In most of the studies, the DQI module could demonstrate a rapid analysis of potential errors and outliers’ identifications in historical production data which was quantified by a 26% improvement. Moreover, the quality checking and cleaning process shows an improvement of 20 to 50% in timesaving compared to the conventional approach. Utilizing the advanced allocation results post DQI which were validated through material balance at reservoir sand package levels as input for the history matching process of simulation modeling works obtained a very good and reasonable history matching quality index (HMQI) improvement up to 25 to 35% in well levels. This improvement resulted in reasonable history matching without using unrealistic multipliers and reducing the uncertainties during prediction works. Leak assessment results proposed possible leaks in eleven wells which five of them were proven to have leaks based on available leak diagnostic job done by the operation team. An advanced multiple-solutions search engine combined with multi-phase deliverability models and material balance analysis to assess the uncertainty in the layer-phase allocation of different surveillance datasets compared to static KH-allocation. This tool assists reservoir engineering with data quality checks and analyzing the historical production in an effective manner and provides an alternative solution to facilitate the history matching process in dynamic simulation modeling and reduce the uncertainties range. The multi-phase splitting factors is a key advanced feature compared to the single-phase method which is commonly used in the industry. This technology can be potentially deployed during any FDP project and simulation work.
A set of examples will be shared for calculating the value of reservoir surveillance conducted in gas fields tying into LNG plants. This includes such measurements as transient pressure, rate and temperature changes, fluid chemistry or diagnostic information related to well integrity. These data are typically gathered during production operations, but their value is rarely quantified. The objective of this paper is to use existing VoI methods to provide a means to justify this reservoir surveillance. The results will be useful for justifying routine surveillance activities to other departments in the upstream organisation, e.g. Operations and Facilities Engineering. Established VoI methods will be applied to common surveillance problems occurring in production operations. In operating fields, gauges and metering equipment are already installed so there is no additional cost. However, surveillance may incur either personnel labour costs (when wells are still flowing) or lost production caused by shutting in wells (e.g. pressure transient tests). This is compared against the calculated value of a more reliable production forecast incorporating the new surveillance data. This value is realised when the future supply to a gas plant is ensured – i.e. avoiding future ullage or penalties from missed cargo deliveries. Discussion is provided on the degree of uncertainty for which interpreted production data (pressure, rate flow and time) resolves reservoir parameters and forecasting metrics. This is known as imperfect information. It is concluded that VoI is a powerful method with application in two areas. Firstly, it can be used in daily reservoir management and to increase production forecast reliability. Secondly, the surveillance data are used to inform future decisions such as infill drilling or compression projects (gas plant ullage). It is observed that management of operating companies are more inclined to agree to reservoir surveillance when its value is clearly calculated. Several generic and non-specific case studies are given that could be applied to gas fields on the North West Shelf in Australia. Most commonly, the VoI method is used prior to field development during the appraisal stage. The main difference for operating fields is that there are usually minimal material/service costs for these tests, but the cost relates to foregone production when the well is offline or curtailed. Few papers, if any, discuss its application to producing wells. However, in the upstream organisation the question of the value of surveillance arises and should be addressed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.