Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
AimThe purpose of the study was to describe social and healthcare educators' evidence‐based healthcare competence and explore the associated factors.DesignA descriptive, cross‐sectional study was carried out.MethodsThe research spanned 5 universities, 19 universities of applied sciences, and 10 vocational colleges in Finland from September to December 2022. Social and healthcare educators (n = 256), of which 21 worked at universities, 176 worked at universities of applied sciences, and 49 worked at vocational colleges. Data collection employed a self‐assessed instrument that was designed to measure evidence‐based healthcare competence based on the JBI Model of Evidence‐based Healthcare. Competence profiles were formed using K‐cluster grouping analysis.ResultsThe educators' self‐evaluations of their level of evidence‐based healthcare competence were generally at a satisfactory level, with subsequent analyses identifying four distinct profiles of evidence‐based healthcare competence. The profiles demonstrated statistically significant differences in terms of evidence synthesis and evidence transfer competencies. The factors associated with evidence‐based healthcare competence included level of education, the year in which a professional had obtained their highest degree, current organization of employment, and participation in continuing education.ConclusionsEducators require various types of support for developing high levels of evidence‐based healthcare competence. The identification of distinct competence profiles can be pivotal to providing educators with training that is tailored to their exact needs to provide an individualized learning path.What Problem Did the Study Address? Educators value the role of evidence in teaching, which reinforces the need to integrate aspects of the JBI Model of evidence‐based healthcare into educators' competencies. Aspects of the JBI Model of evidence‐based healthcare have not been holistically measured, with only certain components of the model considered separately. Educators need to better understand the global healthcare environment so they can identify research gaps and subsequently develop healthcare systems through their educational role. Higher academic education, work experience, organizational support, and continuous education play essential roles in the development of educators' evidence‐based healthcare competence. What Were the Main Findings? Educators generally have high levels of competence in evidence‐based healthcare. Educators have mastered the different components of the JBI model of evidence‐based healthcare but need to improve in areas such as the transfer and implementation of evidence. Where and on Whom Will the Research Have an Impact? Determining evidence‐based healthcare competence profiles for educators can be used to provide individualized learning paths for the development of evidence‐based healthcare competence. Educators need to further develop their competence in evidence‐based healthcare to ensure successful implementation and high‐quality education in the future. Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.
AimThe purpose of the study was to describe social and healthcare educators' evidence‐based healthcare competence and explore the associated factors.DesignA descriptive, cross‐sectional study was carried out.MethodsThe research spanned 5 universities, 19 universities of applied sciences, and 10 vocational colleges in Finland from September to December 2022. Social and healthcare educators (n = 256), of which 21 worked at universities, 176 worked at universities of applied sciences, and 49 worked at vocational colleges. Data collection employed a self‐assessed instrument that was designed to measure evidence‐based healthcare competence based on the JBI Model of Evidence‐based Healthcare. Competence profiles were formed using K‐cluster grouping analysis.ResultsThe educators' self‐evaluations of their level of evidence‐based healthcare competence were generally at a satisfactory level, with subsequent analyses identifying four distinct profiles of evidence‐based healthcare competence. The profiles demonstrated statistically significant differences in terms of evidence synthesis and evidence transfer competencies. The factors associated with evidence‐based healthcare competence included level of education, the year in which a professional had obtained their highest degree, current organization of employment, and participation in continuing education.ConclusionsEducators require various types of support for developing high levels of evidence‐based healthcare competence. The identification of distinct competence profiles can be pivotal to providing educators with training that is tailored to their exact needs to provide an individualized learning path.What Problem Did the Study Address? Educators value the role of evidence in teaching, which reinforces the need to integrate aspects of the JBI Model of evidence‐based healthcare into educators' competencies. Aspects of the JBI Model of evidence‐based healthcare have not been holistically measured, with only certain components of the model considered separately. Educators need to better understand the global healthcare environment so they can identify research gaps and subsequently develop healthcare systems through their educational role. Higher academic education, work experience, organizational support, and continuous education play essential roles in the development of educators' evidence‐based healthcare competence. What Were the Main Findings? Educators generally have high levels of competence in evidence‐based healthcare. Educators have mastered the different components of the JBI model of evidence‐based healthcare but need to improve in areas such as the transfer and implementation of evidence. Where and on Whom Will the Research Have an Impact? Determining evidence‐based healthcare competence profiles for educators can be used to provide individualized learning paths for the development of evidence‐based healthcare competence. Educators need to further develop their competence in evidence‐based healthcare to ensure successful implementation and high‐quality education in the future. Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.
AimsTo identify and reach consensus on dimensions and criteria of a competence assessment instrument for health professionals in relation to the process of evidence‐based healthcare.DesignA two‐round Delphi survey was carried out from April to June 2023.MethodsConsensus was sought from an expert panel on the instrument preliminarily established based on the JBI Model of Evidence‐Based Healthcare and a rapid review of systematic reviews of relevant literature. The level of consensus was reflected by the concentration and coordination of experts' opinions and percentage of agreement. The instrument was revised significantly based on the combination of data analysis, the experts' comments and research group discussions.ResultsSixteen national and three international experts were involved in the first‐round Delphi survey and 17 experts participated in the second‐round survey. In both rounds, full consensus was reached on the four dimensions of the instrument, namely evidence‐generation, evidence‐synthesis, evidence‐transfer and evidence‐implementation. In round‐one, the instrument was revised from 77 to 61 items. In round‐two, the instrument was further revised to have 57 items under the four dimensions in the final version.ConclusionThe Delphi survey achieved consensus on the instrument. The validity and reliability of the instrument needs to be tested in future research internationally.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareSystematic assessment of nurses and other health professionals' competencies in different phases of evidence‐based healthcare process based on this instrument provides implications for their professional development and multidisciplinary team collaboration in evidence‐based practice and better care process and outcomes.ImpactThis study addresses a research gap of lacking an instrument to systematically assess interprofessional competencies in relation to the process of EBHC. The instrument covers the four phases of EBHC process with minimal criteria, highlighting essential aspects of ability to be developed. Identification of health professionals' level of competence in these aspects helps strengthen their capacity accordingly so as to promote virtuous EBHC ecosystem for the ending purpose of improving global healthcare outcomes.Reporting MethodThis study was reported in line with the Conducting and REporting of DElphi studies (CREDES) guidance on Delphi studies.Patient and Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.