Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
AimThis review aimed to provide a current global profile of all existing cancer nursing competency, capability, education and career frameworks and map capabilities and competencies to the clinical, facilitation of education, management and research pillars of practice.DesignScoping review.Data SourcesCumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, Google Scholar, Medline, and PubMed. Gray literature searches and reference list searches were also performed.MethodsThis review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's method and followed PRISMA guidelines for reporting. Screening and data extraction was conducted independently by two or more authors. The quality of frameworks were assessed using The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for textual evidence: policy/consensus guidelines. Data were analyzed and narratively synthesized by experienced cancer nurse researchers.ResultsThirty‐four articles were included, comprising of 29 cancer nursing frameworks. Frameworks were categorized as competency frameworks, career and education frameworks, education/learning pathways, and career/professional development frameworks. Competencies and capabilities described in the frameworks were mapped to the four pillars of practice including clinical (n = 27), facilitation of learning (n = 20), leadership and management (n = 23), and research and scholarship (n = 24).ConclusionsComprehensive cancer nursing frameworks are pivotal in enabling nurse leaders to grow and develop the cancer nursing workforce globally. They are also integral to support cancer nurses in providing high‐quality, effective, and safe care for patients and their families across the cancer continuum.ImpactThis is the first review to comprehensively capture and synthesize the capabilities, educational components, and career pathways outlined in existing cancer nursing frameworks worldwide and highlights where areas of improvement are needed to support professional growth, job satisfaction and retention of cancer nurses.No Patient of Public ContributionThis article is a review of frameworks and does not include patient or public contribution.
AimThis review aimed to provide a current global profile of all existing cancer nursing competency, capability, education and career frameworks and map capabilities and competencies to the clinical, facilitation of education, management and research pillars of practice.DesignScoping review.Data SourcesCumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, Google Scholar, Medline, and PubMed. Gray literature searches and reference list searches were also performed.MethodsThis review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's method and followed PRISMA guidelines for reporting. Screening and data extraction was conducted independently by two or more authors. The quality of frameworks were assessed using The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for textual evidence: policy/consensus guidelines. Data were analyzed and narratively synthesized by experienced cancer nurse researchers.ResultsThirty‐four articles were included, comprising of 29 cancer nursing frameworks. Frameworks were categorized as competency frameworks, career and education frameworks, education/learning pathways, and career/professional development frameworks. Competencies and capabilities described in the frameworks were mapped to the four pillars of practice including clinical (n = 27), facilitation of learning (n = 20), leadership and management (n = 23), and research and scholarship (n = 24).ConclusionsComprehensive cancer nursing frameworks are pivotal in enabling nurse leaders to grow and develop the cancer nursing workforce globally. They are also integral to support cancer nurses in providing high‐quality, effective, and safe care for patients and their families across the cancer continuum.ImpactThis is the first review to comprehensively capture and synthesize the capabilities, educational components, and career pathways outlined in existing cancer nursing frameworks worldwide and highlights where areas of improvement are needed to support professional growth, job satisfaction and retention of cancer nurses.No Patient of Public ContributionThis article is a review of frameworks and does not include patient or public contribution.
Contact nursing services have been implemented in Swedish cancer care to increase healthcare quality. Too little is known about the content and quality of these services and the organizational prerequisites provided to contact nurses. The aim of this study was to explore contact nurses’ perceptions of their services and organizational prerequisites, as well as the connection between organizational prerequisites and moral stress. A cross-sectional survey was utilized consisting of a study-specific questionnaire and a select part of the Stress of Conscience Questionnaire. The study is reported in accordance with STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional studies. The results showed that contact nursing service content varied across settings and that 84% of contact nurses have what was categorized as satisfactory or moderately satisfactory self-reported organizational prerequisites. Perceived moral stress differed between contact nurses depending on organizational prerequisites. The variability of both services and prerequisites can be described as inequities in care and complicates evaluation and comparison.
Background: Genomics is a foundational element of precision health and can be used to identify inherited cancers, cancer related risks, therapeutic decisions, and to address health disparities. However, there are structural barriers across the cancer care continuum, including an underprepared nursing workforce, long wait times for service, and inadequate policy infrastructure that limit equitable access to the benefits of genomic discoveries. These barriers have persisted for decades, yet they are modifiable. Two distinct waves of efforts to integrate genomics into nursing practice are analyzed. Drawing on research and observations during these waves, this discussion paper explores additional approaches to accelerate workforce development and health system transformation. Results: Three recommendations for a third wave of efforts to integrate genomics are explored. (1) Collaborate across the domains of nursing practice, professions, and sectors to reset priorities in response to emerging evidence, (2) Education in leadership, policy and practice for rapid scale-up of workforce and health system transformation, and (3) Create a research framework that generates evidence to guide nursing practice. Conclusions: Preparing nurses to lead and practice at the forefront of innovation requires concerted efforts by nurses in all five domains of practice and can optimize health outcomes. Leveraging nursing as a global profession with new strategies can advance genomics-informed nursing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.