2009
DOI: 10.1109/jstsp.2008.2011107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Segmentation Techniques for Lung Nodules, Liver Metastases, and Enlarged Lymph Nodes in CT Scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the results presented in Table 6.13 the algorithm estimated the volume of the tumor(s) from CT images with an accuracy of about 86% for the 13 datasets out of the 20 that had livers with tumors. Although the accuracy is not as high as the liver segmentation approach, this accuracy is comparable to the results obtained from different studies (Abdel-massieh et al, 2010;Choudhary et al, 2008;Moltz et al, 2008;Qi et al, 2008;Xu et al, 2010;Yoav et al, 2008).…”
Section: Tumor and Blood Vessel Segmentationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…From the results presented in Table 6.13 the algorithm estimated the volume of the tumor(s) from CT images with an accuracy of about 86% for the 13 datasets out of the 20 that had livers with tumors. Although the accuracy is not as high as the liver segmentation approach, this accuracy is comparable to the results obtained from different studies (Abdel-massieh et al, 2010;Choudhary et al, 2008;Moltz et al, 2008;Qi et al, 2008;Xu et al, 2010;Yoav et al, 2008).…”
Section: Tumor and Blood Vessel Segmentationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Oncology prototype software (Version 1.9.0; 2012-11-15 Release; Qt Version 4.8.0 Fraunhofer MEVIS, Siemens) was used for semi-automated 3D segmentation of liver lesions (11). There is no general consent on a gold standard for volumetric lesion quantification in the presented scenario yet.…”
Section: Image Analysis and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no general consent on a gold standard for volumetric lesion quantification in the presented scenario yet. However, the Fraunhofer method/algorithm has been tested and shown to be reliable (11). In each patient, the Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI dataset underwent volumetric analysis of all identifiable lesions in a semi-automated manner as shown in Figs.…”
Section: Image Analysis and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software uses a dedicated algorithm for the segmentation of liver lesions based on lesion density, image noise and contrast difference with respect to the adjacent liver parenchyma. After an initial diameter is drawn by the reader in an arbitrary slice on a liver lesion, region-growing-based algorithms are used in combination with watershed transformation and distance transformation algorithms for the segmentation and separation of adjacent structures of similar density (e. g. vessels, bile ducts or adjacent adipose tissue) [16]. As the purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of different reconstruc- tion kernels on semi-automated segmentation, any reader-dependent influence had to be excluded.…”
Section: Semi-automated Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%