32nd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 1996
DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-3123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancement in cryogenic propulsion system performance through propellant densification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A K‐T decision‐making method has been conducted to determine the optimization scheme for producing, loading and maintaining the subcooling degree. Lak et al . reported that in order to design and build an LH 2 densification unit prototype and to validate thermodynamic characteristics of the tanks, a technology demonstration program was proposed by Rockwell and NASA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A K‐T decision‐making method has been conducted to determine the optimization scheme for producing, loading and maintaining the subcooling degree. Lak et al . reported that in order to design and build an LH 2 densification unit prototype and to validate thermodynamic characteristics of the tanks, a technology demonstration program was proposed by Rockwell and NASA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A K-T decision-making method has been conducted to determine the optimization scheme for producing, loading and maintaining the subcooling degree. Lak et al [10] reported that in order to design and build an LH 2 densification unit prototype and to validate thermodynamic characteristics of the tanks, a technology demonstration program was proposed by Rockwell and NASA. Previous studies [11][12][13] described the ground loading systems of Saturn I/IB/V launch vehicle in detail, including system facilities of LH 2 and LO 2 , test system operation and prelaunch sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GRC continued development for another 8 years with several advances working with the X-33 program, including construction of two densifier units (0.9 kg/sec and 3.6 kg/sec), and conducted several transfer and loading demonstrations [7][8][9]. At this time, the Space Shuttle program considered switching to densified propellants as an upgrade to launch more mass to orbit, but operational concerns and the need for a costly engine recertification effort resulted in the decision to pursue the super-lightweight external tank modification instead [10]. NASA continued development of densifier systems with the 2nd Generation Reusable Launch Vehicle program, funding three separate contracts to build prototype units and investigate refrigeration technologies [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many have conducted studies for propellant densification [1] [2] [3]. Most of the studies suggest to place the densification operation between the ground storage tank and launch vehicle [4] [5] [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%