2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.02.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancement in the modeling of pressure-flow for the guidance of development and scale-up of commercial-scale biopharmaceutical chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) to determine the permeability, k, which was found to be 1.1×10 -8 cm 2 . This obtained permeability of the nonwoven membrane packed column with a fiber diameter of 3 µm is higher than the literature values for ion exchange columns packed with resins (for materials with particle diameter of 60-90 µm, the permeability is in the order of 10 -9 cm 2 ) [49,50]. The primary reason for the higher permeability value of the nonwoven packed column is the higher bed porosity (~70%) compared to that of resin packed bed chromatography (30-40%).…”
Section: Permeability Characterizationcontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…(3) to determine the permeability, k, which was found to be 1.1×10 -8 cm 2 . This obtained permeability of the nonwoven membrane packed column with a fiber diameter of 3 µm is higher than the literature values for ion exchange columns packed with resins (for materials with particle diameter of 60-90 µm, the permeability is in the order of 10 -9 cm 2 ) [49,50]. The primary reason for the higher permeability value of the nonwoven packed column is the higher bed porosity (~70%) compared to that of resin packed bed chromatography (30-40%).…”
Section: Permeability Characterizationcontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The slopes of the curves are the permeability coefficients, which are equal to 0.92 × 10 −7 cm 2 . This obtained value is 1-3 times higher than the literature values of membranes developed for the similar purposes [43] and 1-2 times higher than the values of columns packed with ion exchange beads [44,45]. Many factors such as pore structure, shape, size, swelling degree and compatibility with mobile phase can change the back pressure of column.…”
Section: Pressure Drop Measurementscontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…The slope of the curves is the permeability coefficient, which is equal to 0.95 × 10 −7 cm 2 and 1.51 × 10 −7 cm 2 for the 5-mm and 50-mm diameter columns, respectively. These obtained values are between one-and three-times greater than the literature values of membranes developed for similar purposes [35,61] and between one-and two-times greater than the values of columns packed with ion exchange beads [62,63]. The pressure flow curves can also be accounted for until the critical flow velocity is reached, when the pressure drop rises to an extreme value; however, this needs further investigation due to the limitation of system compatibility.…”
Section: Pressure Drop Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 78%