2019 IEEE 60th International Scientific Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University (RTUCON) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/rtucon48111.2019.8982349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancements and Restrictions of E-Assessment in View of Remote Learning in Engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E-evaluation plays vital roles within remote learning in the form of summative evaluation (through electronic tests), formative evaluation (such as the use of portfolio), and evaluating students performance within authentic language skills in which they employ the English language as a medium, in addition to the other forms of evaluation such as self-evaluation, peer evaluation, and remote learning program evaluation through a variety of means, including student feedback (Morgan, 2020;Pena & Lim, 2020;Zayapragassarazan, 2020;Raud & Vodovozov, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…E-evaluation plays vital roles within remote learning in the form of summative evaluation (through electronic tests), formative evaluation (such as the use of portfolio), and evaluating students performance within authentic language skills in which they employ the English language as a medium, in addition to the other forms of evaluation such as self-evaluation, peer evaluation, and remote learning program evaluation through a variety of means, including student feedback (Morgan, 2020;Pena & Lim, 2020;Zayapragassarazan, 2020;Raud & Vodovozov, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3-Developing the initial draft of the questionnaire: in this step, the researcher reviewed a number of relevant previous studies on remote learning (e.g. Pohan, 2020;Whalen, 2020;Whittle Tiwari, Yan & Williams, 2020;Aguliera, & Nightengale-Lee, 2020;Carter Jr, Rice, Yang & Jackson, 2020;Correa, 2020;Morgan, 2020;Safi, Wenzel & Spalding, 2020;Affouneh, Salha & Khlaif, 2020;Ali, 2020;MacMahon, Leggett & Carroll, 2020;Dreesen, Akseer, Brossard, Dewan, Giraldo, Kamei & Correa, 2020;Clausen, Bunte & Robertson, 2020;Raud & Vodovozov, 2019). Based on reviewing these previous studies, the researcher developed an initial draft of the instrument that included 19 items in the first dimension (planning and designing learning experiences), 12 items in the second dimension (Facilitating students' learning), 14 items in the third dimension (engaging students), 9 items in the fourth dimension (evaluation), and 5 items the last dimension (professionalism).…”
Section: Instrument Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the task is facilitated by the fact that many teachers share their experience in conducting distance learning [4] - [7]. On the other hand, not all disciplines can be studied remotely [8]. Undeniably, theory without practice is dead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%