2013
DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2012.670310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances and applications of chance-constrained approaches to systems optimisation under uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with deterministic constraints which must always hold, probabilistic constraints allow for some violations with some usually very small pre-defined probability. Two reasons motivate the use of probabilistic constraints when considering uncertainties [5], [15]: 1) When considering rare events for the uncertainty (such as large load or wind power forecast errors in the context of power systems), it might be unavoidable that the constraints are violated. In the theoretical framework, this applies when considering unbounded probability distribution function (as is the case with the usual Gaussian distribution for loads), for which there will always be cases, albeit unlikely, for which the constraints are violated.…”
Section: Chance-constrained Optimal Power Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with deterministic constraints which must always hold, probabilistic constraints allow for some violations with some usually very small pre-defined probability. Two reasons motivate the use of probabilistic constraints when considering uncertainties [5], [15]: 1) When considering rare events for the uncertainty (such as large load or wind power forecast errors in the context of power systems), it might be unavoidable that the constraints are violated. In the theoretical framework, this applies when considering unbounded probability distribution function (as is the case with the usual Gaussian distribution for loads), for which there will always be cases, albeit unlikely, for which the constraints are violated.…”
Section: Chance-constrained Optimal Power Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the form of the state constraint set X , there are two types of chance constraints according to the definitions below. 8) where P denotes the probability operator, δ x ∈ (0, 1) is the risk acceptability level of constraint violation for the states, and G ( j) and g ( j) denote the jth row of G and g, respectively. This requires that all rows j have to be jointly fulfilled with the probability 1 − δ x .…”
Section: Chance-constrained Mpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By setting this value properly, the operator/user can trade conservatism against performance. Relevant works that address the CC-MPC approach in water systems can be found in [8,22] and references therein. Therefore, this chapter is focused on the design and assessment of CC-MPC and TB-MPC controllers for the operational management of transport water networks, which may be described using only flow equations, discussing their advantages and weaknesses in the sense of applicability and performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale of this approach is to replace hard constraints with probabilistic constraints and the nominal cost function with its expected value in the MPC formulation [18], leading to a stochastic optimization problem. CC-MPC offers advantages as robustness, flexibility, low computational requirements, and the possibility of including the level of reliability associated with the constraints [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%