2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances and Challenges in Computational Target Prediction

Abstract: Target deconvolution is a vital initial step in preclinical drug development to determine research focus and strategy. In this respect, computational target prediction is used to identify the most probable targets of an orphan ligand or the most similar targets to a protein under investigation. Applications range from the fundamental analysis of the mode-of-action over polypharmacology or adverse effect predictions to drug repositioning. Here, we provide a review on published ligand- and target-based as well a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whitish solid. mp: 142-144 C. 1 3-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)-6,7-dimethoxyquinazolin-2,4(1H,3H)-dione (10). Reagents: 3-(4-fluorobenzyl)-6,7-dimethoxyquinazolin-2,4(1H,3H)-dione (1.2 mmol) obtained by method A from methyl 2-amino-4,5-dimethoxibenzoate and 1-fluoro-4-(isocyanatomethyl)benzene), 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl chloride (266 mL, 1.8 mmol), NaHCO 3 (302 mg, 3.6 mmol) and DMF (6.0 mL).…”
Section: Chemical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whitish solid. mp: 142-144 C. 1 3-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)-6,7-dimethoxyquinazolin-2,4(1H,3H)-dione (10). Reagents: 3-(4-fluorobenzyl)-6,7-dimethoxyquinazolin-2,4(1H,3H)-dione (1.2 mmol) obtained by method A from methyl 2-amino-4,5-dimethoxibenzoate and 1-fluoro-4-(isocyanatomethyl)benzene), 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl chloride (266 mL, 1.8 mmol), NaHCO 3 (302 mg, 3.6 mmol) and DMF (6.0 mL).…”
Section: Chemical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular advantages and disadvantages of phenotypic vs. target-based approaches are well known, and the combination of both strategies is logically the best way to move forward and optimise the drug discovery process 8,9 . Recognising the pivotal role of target identification and the challenging task of identifying the MOA for bioactive small molecules, significant progress has been made to develop a number of computational strategies to unveil the MOA of phenotypic hits 10 . In silico target identification offers chances for drug repurposing and for the detection of new links between disease and known targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most popular methods are random forest [11] (RF) and support vector machine [12] (SVM) models. A comprehensive overview and review of drug target prediction methods is given by Sydow et al [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter can be achieved by a so-called “inverse VS” utilizing techniques like 2D-similarity searches [ 7 ], 3D-similarity searches [ 8 ], and pharmacophore-based VS [ 9 , 10 ]. Many such tools have been made public in the past decade [ 11 , 12 , 13 ], aiming to boost both drug repurposing efforts and drug discovery as a whole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%