1996
DOI: 10.1021/ar9500675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances and Continuing Challenges in Achieving Realistic and Predictive Simulations of the Properties of Organic and Biological Molecules

Abstract: have contributed a great deal. In the area of conformational sampling, the work of Yax Sun, Carlos Simmerling, and Steve DeBolt is featured prominently. Free energy calculations involved studies by

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
206
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
206
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Trialanine was simulated in the ff96 (27), ff99 (28), ff99sbnmr-ildn (29,30), CHARMM27 (31,32), and OPLS-AA (33) force fields, as previously reported (11). Simulations were performed using Gromacs 4.5 (34) and run at constant temperature (300 K) and pressure (1.01 atm).…”
Section: Methods Molecular Dynamics Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trialanine was simulated in the ff96 (27), ff99 (28), ff99sbnmr-ildn (29,30), CHARMM27 (31,32), and OPLS-AA (33) force fields, as previously reported (11). Simulations were performed using Gromacs 4.5 (34) and run at constant temperature (300 K) and pressure (1.01 atm).…”
Section: Methods Molecular Dynamics Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was prepared with the GROMACS 38,39 3.3 utility PDB2GMX with default protonation states, using a GROMACS port 40 of the AMBER 96 41 force field. Since the cavity that makes up the binding site is completely hydrophobic without any nearby titratable groups, these protonation states present no difficulties.…”
Section: System Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exponential averaging formula does not work for the fully coupled case, since the high-energy, exponential tail is not adequately sampled during simulations; direct implementation of the exponential averaging formula leads to a 16 kJ/mol error in the free energy. Larger cases such as CF 4 become even more problematic, 50 and no detectable overlap would occur for a small peptide, for example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%