2021
DOI: 10.5194/tc-15-5483-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in altimetric snow depth estimates using bi-frequency SARAL and CryoSat-2 Ka–Ku measurements

Abstract: Abstract. Although snow depth on sea ice is a key parameter for sea ice thickness (SIT) retrieval, there currently does not exist reliable estimations. In the Arctic, nearly all SIT products use a snow depth climatology (the modified Warren-99 climatology, W99m) constructed from in situ data obtained prior to the first significant impacts of climate change. In the Antarctic, the lack of information on snow depth remains a major obstacle in the development of reliable SIT products. In this study, we present the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome the need for external snow depth information, future altimeters such as CRISTAL (Kern et al, 2020) will be equipped with dual-frequency radar altimeters, with the snow depth estimation being derived from the difference between the signals at Ku (13 GHz) and Ka (35 GHz) frequencies. Garnier et al (2021) already tested this possibility for snow depth and SIT retrievals with encouraging results, using two different altimetric missions, CS2 at 13 GHz and SARAL/AltiKa at 35 GHz (Verron et al, 2015). With SARAL/AltiKa limited to 82°N (thus excluding most of the multi-year ice), we did not consider this product in the current comparison.…”
Section: Global Arctic Results Over the Wintermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To overcome the need for external snow depth information, future altimeters such as CRISTAL (Kern et al, 2020) will be equipped with dual-frequency radar altimeters, with the snow depth estimation being derived from the difference between the signals at Ku (13 GHz) and Ka (35 GHz) frequencies. Garnier et al (2021) already tested this possibility for snow depth and SIT retrievals with encouraging results, using two different altimetric missions, CS2 at 13 GHz and SARAL/AltiKa at 35 GHz (Verron et al, 2015). With SARAL/AltiKa limited to 82°N (thus excluding most of the multi-year ice), we did not consider this product in the current comparison.…”
Section: Global Arctic Results Over the Wintermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garnier et al. (2021) already tested this possibility for snow depth and SIT retrievals with encouraging results, using two different altimetric missions, CS2 at 13 GHz and SARAL/AltiKa at 35 GHz (Verron et al., 2015). With SARAL/AltiKa limited to 82°N (thus excluding most of the multi‐year ice), we did not consider this product in the current comparison.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These methods suffer from a lack of in situ measurements to calibrate the estimations, which can have several sources of errors, such as the presence of the snow cover, as well as uncertainties on the freeboard, on the densities of ice and snow, etc. (Garnier et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent snow depth data based on the passive microwave, satellite altimetry, and numerical model can help to improve sea ice thickness retrieval (Blanchard-Wrigglesworth et al, 2018;Garnier et al, 2021;Kwok et al, 2020;Liston et al, 2020;Petty et al, 2018;Rostosky et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%