2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00239-015-9673-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in Computer Simulation of Genome Evolution: Toward More Realistic Evolutionary Genomics Analysis by Approximate Bayesian Computation

Abstract: NGS technologies present a fast and cheap generation of genomic data. Nevertheless, ancestral genome inference is not so straightforward due to complex evolutionary processes acting on this material such as inversions, translocations, and other genome rearrangements that, in addition to their implicit complexity, can co-occur and confound ancestral inferences. Recently, models of genome evolution that accommodate such complex genomic events are emerging. This letter explores these novel evolutionary models and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the Pyvolve engine has already successfully been applied to investigate the relationship between mutation-selection and dN / dS modeling frameworks and to identify estimation biases in certain dN / dS models [ 18 ]. Moreover, we believe that Pyvolve provides a convenient tool for easy incorporation of complex simulations, for instance those used in approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) or MCMC methods [ 40 ], into Python pipelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the Pyvolve engine has already successfully been applied to investigate the relationship between mutation-selection and dN / dS modeling frameworks and to identify estimation biases in certain dN / dS models [ 18 ]. Moreover, we believe that Pyvolve provides a convenient tool for easy incorporation of complex simulations, for instance those used in approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) or MCMC methods [ 40 ], into Python pipelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this concern, in addition to the development of new empirical models, codon models may follow two interesting trends. First, the consideration of heterogeneity along the sequence and over time, where different sites/regions and time periods could evolve under different models (Arenas, 2015a ; Zoller et al, 2015 ). Note that these partition schemes can be very realistic, for example by considering different models for coding and non-coding regions.…”
Section: Trends In Codon Substitution Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, although current research on amino acid substitution models is providing more sophisticated models, these models are usually not applied by evolutionary biologists because they are not implemented in evolutionary frameworks and, consequently, these models are often forgotten. In order to consider complex substitution models in model selection and in evolutionary analysis, an alternative strategy can be the approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) approach (Beaumont, 2010 ; Csilléry et al, 2010 ; Sunnaker et al, 2013 ; Lopes et al, 2014 ; Arenas, 2015a ). Basically, simulated data under different complex models are contrasted with real data through multiple regression adjustments to identify the model that best fits the real data, and to estimate the parameter values of the model corresponding to the studied dataset (see Lopes et al, 2014 for an example of ABC using complex codon models).…”
Section: Trends In Amino Acid Substitution Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the Pyvolve engine has already 109 successfully been applied to investigate the relationship between mutation-selection and 110 dN/dS modeling frameworks and to identify estimation biases in certain dN/dS 111 models [18]. Moreover, we believe that Pyvolve provides a convenient tool for easy 112 incorporation of complex simulations, for instance those used in approximate Bayesian 113 computation (ABC) or MCMC methods [40], into Python pipelines.…”
Section: Conclusion 102mentioning
confidence: 99%